Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional ground motor sprayer had the worst lost spraying on the ground, about 44 %, on onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
conventional ground motor sprayere5
Outcome
lost spraying in grounde5
Direction
worste5
Value
44%e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–369
e5

“Conventional ground motor sprayer revealed the worst equipment in lost spraying in ground about 44% from spraying volume was lost on ground, but the best equipment saving lost spraying on ground was electrostatic Agrimondo 15.5% from spraying volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1789

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOME DIFFERENT SPRAYING TECHNIQUES TO CONTROL ONION THRIPS (THRIPS TABACI LIND. [THYSANOPTERA: THRIPIDAE]).

I. M. Ammar; A. E. Ammar Menoufia Journal of Plant Protection 2020. doi:10.21608/mjapam.2020.170546

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrostatic Agrimondo sprayer had the best saving of lost spraying on the ground, 15.5 %, on onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
electrostatic Agrimondoe5
Outcome
lost spraying on grounde5
Direction
beste5
Value
15.5%e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–369
e5

“Conventional ground motor sprayer revealed the worst equipment in lost spraying in ground about 44% from spraying volume was lost on ground, but the best equipment saving lost spraying on ground was electrostatic Agrimondo 15.5% from spraying volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1789

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOME DIFFERENT SPRAYING TECHNIQUES TO CONTROL ONION THRIPS (THRIPS TABACI LIND. [THYSANOPTERA: THRIPIDAE]).

I. M. Ammar; A. E. Ammar Menoufia Journal of Plant Protection 2020. doi:10.21608/mjapam.2020.170546

Other claims from this paper (11)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-volume spraying reduced refill time and spray lost on the ground.

Outcome
time lost in the process filling the machines with the spray solution and saving the lost spray on the grounde0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Low Volume spraying reducing the time lost in the process filling the machines with the spray solution and saving the lost spray on the ground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1937

Title

Field Application of Bio-Insecticides On Spiny Bollworm, Earias insulana (Bosid.) On Cotton by Using Recent Low Volume Ground Spraying Equipment

Rehab, Dar; Dalia, Lotfy; Hemat, Moustafa Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences 2020. doi:10.21608/eajbsa.2020.69092

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Helicopter spraying reduced droplets lost to the ground.

Treatment
unmanned helicoptere0
Outcome
droplet losses to the grounde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
motorized knapsack sprayere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The unmanned helicopter effectively reduced droplet losses to the ground compared with that of the motorized knapsack sprayer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–697

Title

Comparison of the physical spray efficacy between unmanned helicopter and motorized knapsack sprayer in Thai paddy field

Pruetthichat Punyawattoe; Woravit Sutjaritthammajariyangkun; Supangkana Thirawut; et al. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2021. doi:10.35495/ajab.2021.02.104

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground spray loss for Ulva was 35% lower than Matabi.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
lost spray-on grounde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
Matabi sprayere0

Verbatim

e0

“Data also revealed that lost spray-on ground for Ulva sprayer was lower than Matabi sprayer with 35%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1513
t0

“Soybean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–209

Title

Field Comparison Between Tow Natural Compounds and A Common Acaricide On Two-Spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae And Three of Its Natural Enemies by Using Certain Ground Spraying Equipment on Soybean Crop in Egypt.

Rehab, Dar; Hala, Alakhdar Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. B, Zoology 2020. doi:10.21608/eajbsz.2020.109409

Other claims from this paper (14)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.