View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbivory intensity did not differ between mycorrhizal and non- mycorrhizal plants.
Outcomeherbivory intensity e0 Directiondid not differ e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “herbivory intensity did not differ between mycorrhizal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–735 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Root mycorrhizal intensity was 80.45%.
Outcomemycorrhizal intensity e0 Verbatim
e0 “mycorrhizal intensity (80.45%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1154 t0 “Faba bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal intensity and nodulation intensity varied greatly between the legume species studied.
OutcomeMycorrhizal and nodulation intensity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Mycorrhizal and nodulation intensity varied greatly between legume species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–576 e1 “legumes growing in different areas of Jazan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–422 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal intensity reached 54% in organic plots.
Outcomemycorrhizal intensity e0 Verbatim
e0 “reaching 35% and 54% for arbuscule abundance and mycorrhizal intensity , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1195 t0 “walnut ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–59 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal intensity was highest at Toufalazte, at 57%.
Interactorarbuscular mycorrhizal fungi e1 symbiont e0 Outcomemycorrhizal intensity e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mycorrhizal intensity is high at the site of Toufalazte (57%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–682 e1 “arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–69 t0 “Argania spinosa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–83 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors produced quantitative global maps of mycorrhizal colonization intensity based on environmental drivers.
Interactormycorrhizal fungi t0 symbiont Outcomeglobal maps of intensity of mycorrhizal colonization e0 Verbatim
e0 “We provide the first quantitative global maps of intensity of mycorrhizal colonization based on environmental drivers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1778 t0 “plant root colonization intensity by mycorrhizal fungi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–73 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plantago maritima had the highest mycorrhizal intensity and arbusculum richness.
Interactormycorrhizal e0 t0 symbiont Outcomemycorrhizal intensity (M%) and arbusculum richness (A%) e0 Verbatim
e0 “the highest mycorrhizal intensity (M%) and arbusculum richness (A%) was found on the Plantago maritima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–896 t0 “Mycorrhizal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The epi mutation reduced intensity of mycorrhizal root colonization.
Outcomeintensity of mycorrhizal root colonization e0 Directionnegative impact e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “this mutation had a considerable negative impact on the intensity of mycorrhizal root colonization. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–857 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Environmental conditions affected cover crop mycorrhizal colonization intensity .
Outcomemycorrhizal colonization intensity ( M %) e0 Settingenvironmental conditions e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “mycorrhizal colonization intensity ( M %) affected by environmental conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1097 e1 “two winter cereal CC, rye and spelt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–669 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal intensity was relatively low.
Outcomemycorrhizal intensity e0 Directionrelatively low e0 Verbatim
e0 “mycorrhizal intensity was relatively low ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–515 e2 “plant roots from the mofette area Stavešinci (Slovenia) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–309 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.