View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The four materials had obvious morphological differences .
obvious morphological differences e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “they had obvious morphological differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–685 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
These yield differences occurred without obvious vine vigour or morphological differences .
without obvious differences in vine vigour or obvious morphological differences in vegetation or in fruit e0 Verbatim
e0 “Such differences occurred without obvious differences in vine vigour or obvious morphological differences in vegetation or in fruit. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–261 t0 “sultana vines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Aquilaria sinensis in Hainan showed obvious morphological differences .
morphological differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “A.sinensis of Hainan had obvious morphological differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–507 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
No obvious morphological differences were found among three Brandisia taxa.
no obvious morphological differences e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “no obvious morphological differences among Brandisia chevalieri Bonati, B. discolor J.D.Hooker & Thomson, and B. scandens Bonati ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–183 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wild lilies showed obvious numerical morphological differences .
numerical characteristics e0 Verbatim
e0 “there were obvious differences in numerical characteristics among these wild lilies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–252 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Mimulicalyx rosulatus and M. paludigenus show no obvious morphological differences and are conspecific.
morphological differences e1 Verbatim
e1 “no obvious morphological differences could be found and we thus concluded that they are conspecific ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–408 e2 “M. paludigenus is reduced as a synonym of M. rosulatus
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–475 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Transgenic plants showed no obvious morphological or developmental differences from wild-type plants.
morphological or developmental differences e1 wild-type plants e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “salt tolerance of arabidopsis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 e1 “There were no obvious morphological or developmental differences between transgenic and wild-type plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–545 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
No obvious morphological differences were observed among chemotypes.
no morphological differences at first sight e0 Verbatim
e0 “no morphological differences at first sight were observed among them ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–744 e1 “Acantholippia seriphioides
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–77 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Measured juvenility was not associated with obvious morphological differences .
younger and older strains e0 obvious morphological difference e0 not associated e0 Verbatim
e0 “Juvenility as measured in this way was not associated with any obvious morphological difference between younger and older strains, or from the parent. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–495 t0 “LEMNA PERPUSILLA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Obvious morphological differences exist between R. kamoji and D. villosum .
morphological differences e3 Verbatim
t0 “intergeneric hybrid between Roegneria kamoji Ohwi and Dasypyrum villosum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–114 e3 “there were obvious morphological differences between R. kamoji and D. villosum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–411 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Aquilaria sinensis
Arabidopsis
Troncosoa seriphioides
Lemna perpusilla
Campeiostachys kamoji