View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors describe potential use of backscatter technology for one sensor per plant in future precision agriculture.
"one sensor per plant" applications e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “It is described how backscatter technology could be exploited for "one sensor per plant" applications in future precision agriculture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–866 Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The sensor -based planter reached a field efficiency of 84 per cent.
field efficiency e6 Verbatim
t0 “Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 e6 “it gives the field efficiency was 84 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1230 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The WDAQ system recorded approximately 3,200 measurements per sensor per pivot circle.
measurements from each sensor e0 approximately 3,200 measurements e0 one pivot circle e0 Verbatim
e0 “the WDAQ system was able to record approximately 3,200 measurements from each sensor in one pivot circle (360°). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1679 t0 “Plant Height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nano sensor irrigation produced the highest grains per plant at 184.13 g.
nano sensor (IITB) based irrigation system e0 grains per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nano sensor (IITB) based irrigation system recorded the highest grains per plant (184.13 g) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1414 t0 “Maize (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–125 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The sensor -based planter reached a multiple index of 0.95 per cent.
multiple index (Imult) e2 Verbatim
t0 “Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 e2 “multiple index (Imult) of 0.95 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1037 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The sensor -based planter reached a missing index of 1.5 per cent.
missing index (Imiss) e3 Verbatim
t0 “Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 e3 “missing index (Imiss) of 1.5 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1076 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The sensor -based planter reached a cell fill efficiency of 93.33 per cent.
cell fill efficiency e4 Verbatim
t0 “Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 e4 “a cell fill efficiency of 93.33 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1122 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nano sensor irrigation produced the highest cob weight per plant at 243.65 g.
nano sensor (IITB) based irrigation system e0 cob weight per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nano sensor (IITB) based irrigation system recorded the highest grains per plant (184.13 g), cob weight per plant (243.65 g) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1447 t0 “Maize (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–125 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sensor -based and Checkbook irrigation produced similar total profit per hectare across seasons.
Sensor-based irrigation scheduling treatment e0 total profit per hectare e0 Checkbook method e0 Verbatim
e0 “use of the Sensor -based irrigation scheduling treatment resulted in similar values of total profit per hectare when compared to Checkbook method ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2134–2278 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The sensor costs about 12 euros per unit.
Verbatim
e5 “Its very low cost (around 12 euros) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1743 t0 “canopy transpiration in the grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–92 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zingiber officinale
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays
Vitis