View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
HIN had intermediate repeatability across selection stages.
Outcomeintermediate repeatability e1 Verbatim
t0 “Cassava Breeding II ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 e1 “HIN had an intermediate repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1069 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability was low for plant height (PH).
QualifierRepeatability was low e1 Verbatim
e1 “Repeatability was low for LDM, SDM, LSR and PH ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–950 t0 “Paspalum nicorae Parodi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–122 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability was low for LDM, SDM and LSR.
QualifierRepeatability was low e1 Verbatim
e1 “Repeatability was low for LDM, SDM, LSR and PH ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–950 t0 “Paspalum nicorae Parodi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–122 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC fingerprint method for Dipsacus asper has good repeatability , precision and stability.
Outcomerepeatability, precision and stability e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HPLC Fingerprints of Dipsacus asper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–44 e2 “The method has a good repeatability , precision and stability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–902 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability coefficient for berry diameter was 0.72.
OutcomeRepeatability coefficients e1 Qualifierfor berry diameter e1 Verbatim
t0 “table grape progenies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–69 e1 “Repeatability coefficients, ranging from 0.164 for soluble solids content to 0.72 for berry diameter, were estimated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–850 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The method repeatability was 0.96-2.08%.
Verbatim
e0 “repeatability (0.96–2.08%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–719 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC method for schisandrin-type lignans had good repeatability , stability and accuracy.
Outcomerepeatability, stability and accuracy e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Schisandra chinensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 e1 “The method had a good repeatability , stability and accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–593 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability coefficient for soluble solids content was 0.164.
OutcomeRepeatability coefficients e1 Qualifierfor soluble solids content e1 Verbatim
t0 “table grape progenies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–69 e1 “Repeatability coefficients, ranging from 0.164 for soluble solids content to 0.72 for berry diameter, were estimated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–850 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC analysis method has good repeatability .
Qualifiergood in repeatability e3 Not reported Direction
Schema note from the model: method performance stated qualitatively; no value or comparator, so method_resource_result cannot be filled
Verbatim
t0 “Alpinia katsumadai Hayata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 e3 “The analysis method is fast in operation, good in separation, strong in stability and good in repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–846 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The repeatability coefficient for longitudinal fruit diameter was 0.14.
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e1 Verbatim
e0 “Citrus latifolia Tanaka ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–396 e1 “The estimated repeatability coefficients presented values of 0.14 (LFD), 0.16 (TFD), 0.36 (FYP), and 0.38 (NFD) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1441 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.