View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
ZJ2528 had selectivity coefficient 1.3 for Setaria faberii in maize.
InteractorSetaria faberii e0 weed Outcomeselectivity coefficient e0 Verbatim
e0 “selectivity coefficient was 1.3,7.3 to Setaria faberii,Digitaria sanguinalis of grass weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–252 e1 “ZJ2528 is a new patented herbicide in maize field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
ZJ2528 had selectivity coefficient 7.3 for Digitaria sanguinalis in maize.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient e0 Verbatim
e0 “selectivity coefficient was 1.3,7.3 to Setaria faberii,Digitaria sanguinalis of grass weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–252 e1 “ZJ2528 is a new patented herbicide in maize field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The SIOC0426 selectivity coefficient between cotton and Digitaria sanguinalis was 3.534.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient of SIOC0426 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The selectivity coefficient of SIOC0426 between the cotton and Digitaria sanguinalis and Amaranthus retroflexus ,were 3.534 and 4.299,respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–419 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The SIOC0426 selectivity coefficient between cotton and Amaranthus retroflexus was 4.299.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient of SIOC0426 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The selectivity coefficient of SIOC0426 between the cotton and Digitaria sanguinalis and Amaranthus retroflexus ,were 3.534 and 4.299,respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–419 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The ZJ1835 selectivity coefficient for cotton versus Digitaria sanguinalis was 2.14.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient e0 t0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The selectivity coefficient of ZJ1835 between cotton and Digitaria sanguinalis and Amaranthus retroflexus were 2.14 and 13.00,respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–794 t0 “ZJ1835 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 e1 “safety to cotton, selectivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The ZJ1835 selectivity coefficient for cotton versus Amaranthus retroflexus was 13.00.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient e0 t0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The selectivity coefficient of ZJ1835 between cotton and Digitaria sanguinalis and Amaranthus retroflexus were 2.14 and 13.00,respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–794 t0 “ZJ1835 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 e1 “safety to cotton, selectivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Oxadiazon was unsafe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 0.70.
OutcomeSelectivity coefficient e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Selectivity coefficient of oxadiazon and prometryn were 0.70 and 1.24 respectively,and they were unsafe to sweet potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–600 t0 “Sweet potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation All eight herbicides showed high herbicidal activity against redroot amaranth and barnyardgrass. Intervention effect Metolachlor was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 6.15. Intervention effect Pendimethalin was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 5.78. Intervention effect Trifluralin was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 3.04. Intervention effect Acetochlor was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 2.57. Intervention effect Butralin was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 2.29. Intervention effect Clomazone was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 2.19. Intervention effect Prometryn was unsafe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 1.24. Recommendation Prometryn and oxadiazon are not suitable for use in sweet potato fields. Recommendation Metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, acetochlor, butralin and clomazone should go to field experiments to determine feasibility in sweet potato fields. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Prometryn was unsafe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 1.24.
OutcomeSelectivity coefficient e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Selectivity coefficient of oxadiazon and prometryn were 0.70 and 1.24 respectively,and they were unsafe to sweet potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–600 t0 “Sweet potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation All eight herbicides showed high herbicidal activity against redroot amaranth and barnyardgrass. Intervention effect Metolachlor was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 6.15. Intervention effect Pendimethalin was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 5.78. Intervention effect Trifluralin was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 3.04. Intervention effect Acetochlor was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 2.57. Intervention effect Butralin was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 2.29. Intervention effect Clomazone was safe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 2.19. Intervention effect Oxadiazon was unsafe to sweet potato, with a selectivity coefficient of 0.70. Recommendation Prometryn and oxadiazon are not suitable for use in sweet potato fields. Recommendation Metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, acetochlor, butralin and clomazone should go to field experiments to determine feasibility in sweet potato fields. Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
ZJ2528 had selectivity coefficient 5.2 for Amaranthus retroflexus in maize.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient e2 Verbatim
e0 “5.2,7.3 to Amaranthus retroflexus ,Brassica juncea of brood-leaved weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–328 e1 “ZJ2528 is a new patented herbicide in maize field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 e2 “selectivity coefficient was 1.3,7.3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–196 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
ZJ2528 had selectivity coefficient 7.3 for Brassica juncea in maize.
Outcomeselectivity coefficient e2 Verbatim
e0 “5.2,7.3 to Amaranthus retroflexus ,Brassica juncea of brood-leaved weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–328 e1 “ZJ2528 is a new patented herbicide in maize field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 e2 “selectivity coefficient was 1.3,7.3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–196 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.