View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between plant spacing variability and emergence variability were not significant for corn yield .
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1719 e1 “did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between emergence and spacing variability was not significant.
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1718 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Variation in within-row spacing did not affect corn yield .
variation in within‐row spacing e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within‐row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane yield had no significant relationship with solar radiation changes.
changes in solar radiation e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “sugarcane yield had no significant relationship with changes in solar radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1831 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation Projected sugarcane dry-matter yield increases under RCP4.5 were 3.6, 4.7 and 5.8 t ha−1 for the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s against baseline. Observation Projected sugarcane dry-matter yield increases under RCP8.5 were 2.9, 5.4 and 8.5 t ha−1 for the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s against baseline. Observation Projected sugarcane sucrose yield increases under RCP4.5 were 5.2, 7.0 and 8.3 t ha−1 across the future periods. Observation Projected sugarcane sucrose yield increases under RCP8.5 were 4.3, 7.2 and 10.8 t ha−1 across the future periods. Association Sugarcane yield was significantly correlated with rainfall changes. Association Sugarcane yield was significantly correlated with temperature changes. Association Combined radiation, rainfall, temperature and elevated CO2 changes may explain 69% of sugarcane DM yield changes. Association Combined radiation, rainfall, temperature and elevated CO2 changes may explain 76% of sugarcane sucrose yield changes. Association Increased temperature caused a small increase in sugarcane yield. Association Increased rainfall significantly increased sugarcane yield until a limit was exceeded. Association Sugarcane yield decreased when rainfall exceeded a certain limit. Association Sucrose yield increased with temperature at constant radiation. Association Sucrose yield decreased when radiation exceeded a certain limit. Association Temperature changes increased sucrose yield only when radiation and temperature increased together. Association Rainfall increased sucrose yield, though the amplitude was limited. Association Radiation increased sucrose yield, though the amplitude was limited. Recommendation The authors recommend supplemental irrigation to improve sugarcane yield under future climate change. Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Five of six plot- yield comparisons showed no significant difference.
yield differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “in five of six cases yield differences among the four plots were not significantly different ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1385 t0 “Corn and Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum temperature increased spatially in dry areas without statistical significance.
maximum temperature e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “increasing trend in maximum temperature in dry areas, albeit not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–813 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean and median bean yield s did not differ significantly across the decade.
mean or median yields e0 no significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “temporal variability remained relatively stable, with no significant differences in mean or median yield s over the decade (p > 0. 05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1478 e1 “common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fractal dimension did not significantly differ between manure or fertilizer treatments.
no significant difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant difference between D values for manure or fertilizer treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1370 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil nitrate nitrogen was not significantly different between classes based on crop yield .
Soil nitrate nitrogen e2 not significantly different e2 classes based on crop yield e2 Verbatim
t0 “crop yield zones on hummocky terrain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 e2 “Soil nitrate nitrogen varied considerably across the landscape at the site, but was not significantly different (P<0.05) between classes based on crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1684 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Precipitation declined spatially in wetter areas without statistical significance.
spatial distribution of precipitation e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “decreasing trend in the spatial distribution of precipitation in wetter areas and an increasing trend in maximum temperature in dry areas, albeit not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–813 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
Phaseolus vulgaris
Zea mays