View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “tuber” → Tuber . Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).
Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield per plot, tuber yield per plant , tuber number and plant height had the highest positive direct effects on tuber yield .
direct effect on tuber yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 e0 “marketable yield per plot, tuber yield per plant , number of tuber per plant and plant height had highest positive direct effect on tuber yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1098 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tuber yield correlated positively and significantly with plant height, shoot number, average tuber weight, tuber yield per plant and marketable yield per plot.
correlation of tuber yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 e0 “Positive and significant correlation of tuber yield observed for plant height followed by number of shoots per plant , average weight of tuber , tuber yield per plant and marketable yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–926 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Replacement intercropping maximized potato tuber yield per plant , area yield , and tuber size.
replacement intercropping treatments e0 tuber yield per plant, tuber yield of potato per unit area, tuber size e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Maximum tuber yield per plant , tuber yield of potato per unit area, tuber size, mean tuber weight, number of leaves and branches per plant were obtained from replacement intercropping treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1098 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Replacement intercropping gave maximum potato tuber yield per plant , area yield and tuber size.
replacement intercropping treatments e1 tuber yield per plant, tuber yield of potato per unit area, tuber size e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum tuber yield per plant , tuber yield of potato per unit area, tuber size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–982 e1 “were obtained from replacement intercropping treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1098 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
CP 1994 had the highest tuber yield per plant , marketable tuber yield and branch number.
tuber yield per plant, marketable tuber yield per plant and number of branches per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “genotype CP 1994 showed highest tuber yield per plant , marketable tuber yield per plant and number of branches per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–537 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Tuber yield , stems per plant and tuber s per plant followed average tuber weight in contribution to divergence.
tuber yield, number of stems per plant and number of tuber per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “followed by tuber yield , number of stems per plant and number of tuber per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1073 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tuber yield was positively associated with total tuber dry matter per plant .
total tuber dry matter per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “Tuber yield was positively associated with average tuber weight and with total tuber dry matter per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–310 t0 “potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that tuber number per plant contributed more than single- tuber weight to tuber yield per plant .
tuber yield per plant e0 average number of tubers per plant showed more contribution than the average weight of a single tuber e0 Verbatim
e0 “the average number of tuber s per plant showed more contribution than the average weight of a single tuber to the tuber yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1276 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Kufri Pukhraj with Avtar had the highest tuber yield per plant , total tuber yield and tuber equivalent yield .
tuber yield per plant, total tuber yield quintal per hectare, and tuber equivalent yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Kufri Pukhraj with Avtar had the highest tuber yield per plant , total tuber yield quintal per hectare, and tuber equivalent yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1423 t0 “tomato and potato can be produced from a single plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–96 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant ing density significantly affected marketable tuber number per plant and tuber yield s per plant and plot.
marketable tuber number per plant,tuber yield per plant,marketable tuber yield per plant,tuber yield per plot,and marketable tuber yield per plot e0 Southwestern Mountainous Area of Shanxi t0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “significant or highly significant difference was found for marketable tuber number per plant , tuber yield per plant ,marketable tuber yield per plant , tuber yield per plot,and marketable tuber yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–368 t0 “Potato Plant Densities in the Irrigated Flat Field of the Southwestern Mountainous Area of Shanxi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–122 e1 “The potato cv.Favorita was plant ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum tuberosumt0