By interacting organism › Bacteria › Fibrobacteraceae

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All additive treatments increased Fibrobacter succinogenes numbers in the rumen fluid of alfalfa silage incubations.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment: All additive treatmentse3
Interactor: Fibrobacter succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese3other
Outcome: Fibrobacter succinogenes numberse3
Direction: increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“The GT and LP alone or in combination decreased DM losses, pH and non-protein nitrogen contents of alfalfa silage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–477

e3
“All additive treatments decreased ruminal CH4 production, and increased propionic acid molar proportions and Fibrobacter succinogenes numbers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–620

Title

Evaluation of gallnut tannin and Lactobacillus plantarum as natural modifiers for alfalfa silage: Ensiling characteristics, in vitro ruminal methane production, fermentation profile and microbiota

Lei Chen; Xueyan Bao; Gang Guo; et al. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2021. doi:10.1111/jam.15246

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Gallnut tannin and L. plantarum alone or in combination decreased dry matter losses, pH and non-protein nitrogen in alfalfa silage.
Intervention effect All additive treatments decreased in vitro ruminal methane production.
Intervention effect All additive treatments increased propionic acid molar proportions in alfalfa silage fermentation.
Intervention effect LP treatment increased nutrient degradation of alfalfa silage.
Intervention effect LP treatment increased cellobiase, pectinase and protease activities in alfalfa silage.
Intervention effect LP treatment increased Prevotella ruminicola abundance in alfalfa silage incubations.
Intervention effect High-dose GT treatment inhibited nutrient degradation, cellobiase, pectinase and protease activities and P. ruminicola abundance.
Intervention effect LP together with GT alleviated the adverse effects of high-dose GT supply alone.
Intervention effect LP together with GT enhanced pectinase and protease activities compared with high-dose GT alone.
Intervention effect LP together with GT enhanced Rumincoccus flavefaciens and P. ruminicola growth compared with high-dose GT alone.
Recommendation A GT and LP combination can be used as an efficient additive to improve alfalfa silage quality and utilization by ruminants.
Mechanism GT and LP may alleviate inhibitory effects of tannins on feed digestion by modulating ruminal microbiota.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam explosion pretreatment shifted the bacterial community by increasing cellulolytic and propionate-related rumen bacteria such as Prevotella, Treponema, Ruminococcus and Fibrobacter.

Taxon: Corn Stovert0
Treatment: Steam explosion pretreatmente4
Interactor: Prevotella, Treponema, Ruminococcus, FibrobacterTreponemaFibrobacterPrevotellaRuminococcuse5symbiont
Outcome: relative abundance of cellulolytic bacteria and propionate-related bacteriae5
Direction: increasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Corn Stover”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81

e4
“steam explosion pretreatment significantly increased the relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–909

e5
“the shift in fermentation efficiency and pattern was achieved by increasing the relative abundance of cellulolytic bacteria and propionate-related bacteria, such as Prevotella, Treponema, Ruminococcus, Fibrobacter”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1215

Title

Steam Explosion Pretreatment Changes Ruminal Fermentation in vitro of Corn Stover by Shifting Archaeal and Bacterial Community Structure

Kun Wang; Xuemei Nan; Jinjin Tong; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.02027

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. succinogenes increased maize root dry mass by 21.4%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: F. succinogenese0
Interactor: F. succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese0symbiont
Outcome: root dry masse0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 21.4%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“F. succinogenes increased the root dry mass of maize by 21.4%, as well as the nitrogen and phosphorus contents, compared to the control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1191

Title

Application of the bacterial strains Ruminobacter amylophilus, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Enterococcus faecium for growth promotion in maize and soybean plants

Lívia de Paula Silveira Mello; Ana Cláudia dos Santos; Roberta Mendes dos Santos; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2020. doi:10.21475/ajcs.20.14.12.2937.pdf

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect F. succinogenes increased maize nitrogen and phosphorus contents.
Intervention effect R. amylophilus reduced phosphorus concentration in maize shoots.
Intervention effect E. faecium reduced phosphorus concentration in maize shoots.
Intervention effect R. amylophilus increased soil biomass carbon under maize by 76.39% versus the mix.
Intervention effect E. faecium reduced soil biomass carbon under soybean by 56.78% versus the mix.
Observation The three bacteria had plant growth related abilities.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. succinogenes increased maize nitrogen and phosphorus contents.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: F. succinogenese0
Interactor: F. succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese0symbiont
Outcome: nitrogen and phosphorus contentse0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“F. succinogenes increased the root dry mass of maize by 21.4%, as well as the nitrogen and phosphorus contents, compared to the control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1191

Title

Application of the bacterial strains Ruminobacter amylophilus, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Enterococcus faecium for growth promotion in maize and soybean plants

Lívia de Paula Silveira Mello; Ana Cláudia dos Santos; Roberta Mendes dos Santos; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2020. doi:10.21475/ajcs.20.14.12.2937.pdf

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect F. succinogenes increased maize root dry mass by 21.4%.
Intervention effect R. amylophilus reduced phosphorus concentration in maize shoots.
Intervention effect E. faecium reduced phosphorus concentration in maize shoots.
Intervention effect R. amylophilus increased soil biomass carbon under maize by 76.39% versus the mix.
Intervention effect E. faecium reduced soil biomass carbon under soybean by 56.78% versus the mix.
Observation The three bacteria had plant growth related abilities.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding high NDFD sugarcane (IAC86-2480) increased Fibrobacter succinogenes population, only when fed as freshly cut.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Material: IAC86-2480e1
Treatment: diets containing the sugarcane genotype with high NDFDe2
Interactor: Fibrobacter succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese2symbiont
Outcome: Fibrobacter succinogenes populatione2
Direction: increasede2
Qualifier: only when sugarcane was fed as freshly cute2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Feeding diets containing the sugarcane genotype with high NDFD increased Fibrobacter succinogenes population but only when sugarcane was fed as freshly cut (P=0.02)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2094–2258

e1
“Two sugarcane genotypes divergent for stalk NDFD were used: IAC86-2480 with high NDFD and SP91-1049 with low NDFD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–626

e0
“effects of sugarcane NDF digestibility (NDFD) and conservation method on intake”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–303

Title

Effect of fiber digestibility and conservation method on feed intake and the ruminal ecosystem of growing steers1

D. O. Sousa; B. S. Mesquita; J. Diniz-Magalhães; et al. Journal of Animal Science 2014. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8016

Other claims from this paper (16)

Association The effect of sugarcane fiber digestibility on DM and NDF intake depended on the forage conservation method.
Intervention effect High NDFD sugarcane (IAC86-2480) increased DMI only when offered as silage.
Intervention effect High NDFD sugarcane (IAC86-2480) had no effect on DMI when offered as freshly cut.
Intervention effect Conservation method had no effect on total ruminal mass.
Intervention effect Low-NDFD genotype (SP91-1049) showed only a tendency for greater NDF and indigestible NDF ruminal mass.
Intervention effect High NDFD sugarcane (IAC86-2480) had greater NDF turnover and passage rates, only when offered as silage.
Intervention effect Liquid turnover rate in the rumen was greater for diets containing silage.
Intervention effect Genotype had no effect on liquid turnover rate in the rumen.
Intervention effect NDFD genotype had no effect on ruminal pH.
Intervention effect Diets containing sugarcane as silage increased ruminal pH.
Intervention effect Total concentration of short chain fatty acids was greater for diets containing fresh sugarcane.
Intervention effect Proportions of propionate were greater for diets containing fresh sugarcane.
Intervention effect Diets with fresh sugarcane increased the ruminal population of Streptococcus bovis.
Intervention effect Diets with fresh sugarcane increased the ruminal population of Ruminococcus albus.
Intervention effect High NDFD sugarcane (IAC86-2480) increased the relative population of R. albus.
Recommendation The authors recommend using high NDFD sugarcane genotypes, which may increase intake and benefit fiber-degrading bacteria in the rumen.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibrobacter succinogenes degraded fresh forage chicory segments in vitro.

Taxon: forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)Cichorium intybuse0
Interactor: Fibrobacter succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese2other
Outcome: Large segments of fresh forage chicory were degradede2
Setting: in vitroe2

Verbatim

e0
“Determine the susceptibility of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) to degradation by ruminal fibrolytic bacteria”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6–121

e2
“Large segments of fresh forage chicory were degraded in vitro by Lachnospira multiparus and Fibrobacter succinogenes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–320

Title

Degradation of forage chicory by ruminal fibrolytic bacteria

X.Z. Sun; K.N. Joblin; I.G. Andrew; et al. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03861.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibrobacter succinogenes degraded cell-wall pectins extensively, but more slowly than L. multiparus.

Taxon: forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)Cichorium intybuse0
Treatment: Fibrobacter succinogenese6
Interactor: Fibrobacter succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese6other
Outcome: cell-wall pectinse6
Direction: slowere6
Comparator: L. multiparuse6

Verbatim

e0
“Determine the susceptibility of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) to degradation by ruminal fibrolytic bacteria”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6–121

e6
“Fibrobacter succinogenes also degraded cell-wall pectins extensively, but at a slower rate than L. multiparus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–699

Title

Degradation of forage chicory by ruminal fibrolytic bacteria

X.Z. Sun; K.N. Joblin; I.G. Andrew; et al. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03861.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Degradation of chicory was greatest for F. succinogenes.

Taxon: forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)Cichorium intybuse0
Interactor: F. succinogenesFibrobacter succinogenese6other
Outcome: Degradatione6
Direction: greateste6

Verbatim

e0
“Determine the susceptibility of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) to degradation by ruminal fibrolytic bacteria”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6–121

e6
“Degradation was greatest for F. succinogenes which also had cellulolytic activity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1213

Title

Degradation of forage chicory by ruminal fibrolytic bacteria

X.Z. Sun; K.N. Joblin; I.G. Andrew; et al. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03861.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AHP treatment of wheat straw increased dry matter, NDF and ADF degradation over control straw when incubated with mixed ruminal microorganisms or B. succinogenes S85.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: AHP treatmente1
Interactor: mixed ruminal microorganismse1other
Second interactor: B. succinogenes S85Fibrobacter succinogenese1other
Outcome: dry matter, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber degradatione1
Direction: increasede1
Comparator: control WSe1

Verbatim

e0
“The effects of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) treatments on wheat straw (WS) and various cellulosic substrates were determined”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156

e1
“The AHP treatment of WS increased (P less than 0.05) dry matter, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber degradation over control WS when these substrates were incubated with mixed ruminal microorganisms or B. succinogenes S85”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–718

Title

Effects of alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on in vitro degradation of cellulosic substrates by mixed ruminal microorganisms and Bacteroides succinogenes S85

S M Lewis; L Montgomery; K A Garleb; et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1988. doi:10.1128/aem.54.5.1163-1169.1988

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaOH or AHP treatment of crystalline cellulose substrates left acid detergent fiber degradation of cotton fiber and Sigmacell-50 similar to their controls.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume5
Treatment: NaOH or AHPe5
Interactor: B. succinogenes S85Fibrobacter succinogenese5other
Outcome: extent of acid detergent fiber degradation of cotton fiber and Sigmacell-50e5
Direction: similare5
Comparator: their respective controlse5

Verbatim

e5
“When substrates with high levels of crystalline cellulose (raw cotton fiber, Solka floc, and Sigmacell-50) were treated with NaOH or AHP and incubated for 108 h with B. succinogenes S85, extent of acid detergent fiber degradation of cotton fiber and Sigmacell-50 was similar to that of their respective controls”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1453

Title

Effects of alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on in vitro degradation of cellulosic substrates by mixed ruminal microorganisms and Bacteroides succinogenes S85

S M Lewis; L Montgomery; K A Garleb; et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1988. doi:10.1128/aem.54.5.1163-1169.1988

Other claims from this paper (7)

Fibrobacteraceae 18 claims

18 claims