By interacting organism › Bacteria › Marinobacteraceae

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZP-590 inoculation increased maize root fresh weight by 14.25%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: ZP-590t0
Interactor: Marinobacter sp. ZP-590Marinobacter sp. ZP-590t0symbiont
Outcome: root fresh weighte0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 14.25%e0
Qualifier: saline conditionst0
Comparator: non-inoculated controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to the non-inoculated controls, the treatment significantly increased root fresh weight (14.25%; p < 0.05)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1329

t0
“Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–112

Title

Characterization of Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions

Rui Wang; Xiao-Yue Chen; Hao Lu; et al. Diversity 2026. doi:10.3390/d18060330

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect ZP-590 inoculation increased maize stem fresh weight by 125.04%.
Intervention effect Shoot height showed no significant change under inoculation.
Intervention effect Leaf fresh weight showed no significant change under inoculation.
Association Inoculation was associated with systemic metabolic changes in maize.
Observation Maize roots had 394 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize stems had 262 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize leaves had 601 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Antioxidant compounds including flavonoids were up-regulated after inoculation.
Observation Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism pathways changed after inoculation.
Mechanism Carbohydrate and lipid pathway changes may supply energy and structural components for stress adaptation.
Mechanism Antioxidant accumulation mitigated saline-induced oxidative damage by reducing leaf superoxide anion.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZP-590 inoculation increased maize stem fresh weight by 125.04%.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: ZP-590t0
Interactor: Marinobacter sp. ZP-590Marinobacter sp. ZP-590t0symbiont
Outcome: stem fresh weighte0
Direction: increasedt1
Value: 125.04%e0
Comparator: non-inoculated controlst1

Verbatim

e0
“stem fresh weight (125.04%; p < 0.01)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1371

t0
“Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–112

t1
“Compared to the non-inoculated controls, the treatment significantly increased root fresh weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1310

Title

Characterization of Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions

Rui Wang; Xiao-Yue Chen; Hao Lu; et al. Diversity 2026. doi:10.3390/d18060330

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect ZP-590 inoculation increased maize root fresh weight by 14.25%.
Intervention effect Shoot height showed no significant change under inoculation.
Intervention effect Leaf fresh weight showed no significant change under inoculation.
Association Inoculation was associated with systemic metabolic changes in maize.
Observation Maize roots had 394 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize stems had 262 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize leaves had 601 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Antioxidant compounds including flavonoids were up-regulated after inoculation.
Observation Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism pathways changed after inoculation.
Mechanism Carbohydrate and lipid pathway changes may supply energy and structural components for stress adaptation.
Mechanism Antioxidant accumulation mitigated saline-induced oxidative damage by reducing leaf superoxide anion.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height showed no significant change under inoculation.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: ZP-590t0
Interactor: Marinobacter sp. ZP-590Marinobacter sp. ZP-590t0symbiont
Outcome: shoot heighte0
Direction: no significant changese0
Comparator: non-inoculated controlst1

Verbatim

e0
“shoot height and leaf fresh weight showed no significant changes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1444

t0
“Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–112

t1
“non-inoculated controls”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1253

Title

Characterization of Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions

Rui Wang; Xiao-Yue Chen; Hao Lu; et al. Diversity 2026. doi:10.3390/d18060330

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect ZP-590 inoculation increased maize root fresh weight by 14.25%.
Intervention effect ZP-590 inoculation increased maize stem fresh weight by 125.04%.
Intervention effect Leaf fresh weight showed no significant change under inoculation.
Association Inoculation was associated with systemic metabolic changes in maize.
Observation Maize roots had 394 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize stems had 262 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize leaves had 601 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Antioxidant compounds including flavonoids were up-regulated after inoculation.
Observation Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism pathways changed after inoculation.
Mechanism Carbohydrate and lipid pathway changes may supply energy and structural components for stress adaptation.
Mechanism Antioxidant accumulation mitigated saline-induced oxidative damage by reducing leaf superoxide anion.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fresh weight showed no significant change under inoculation.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: ZP-590t0
Interactor: Marinobacter sp. ZP-590Marinobacter sp. ZP-590t0symbiont
Outcome: leaf fresh weighte0
Direction: no significant changese0
Comparator: non-inoculated controlst1

Verbatim

e0
“shoot height and leaf fresh weight showed no significant changes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1444

t0
“Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–112

t1
“non-inoculated controls”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1253

Title

Characterization of Marinobacter sp. ZP-590, a Rhizobacterium That Promotes Maize Growth Under Saline Conditions

Rui Wang; Xiao-Yue Chen; Hao Lu; et al. Diversity 2026. doi:10.3390/d18060330

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect ZP-590 inoculation increased maize root fresh weight by 14.25%.
Intervention effect ZP-590 inoculation increased maize stem fresh weight by 125.04%.
Intervention effect Shoot height showed no significant change under inoculation.
Association Inoculation was associated with systemic metabolic changes in maize.
Observation Maize roots had 394 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize stems had 262 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Maize leaves had 601 differentially accumulated metabolites.
Observation Antioxidant compounds including flavonoids were up-regulated after inoculation.
Observation Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism pathways changed after inoculation.
Mechanism Carbohydrate and lipid pathway changes may supply energy and structural components for stress adaptation.
Mechanism Antioxidant accumulation mitigated saline-induced oxidative damage by reducing leaf superoxide anion.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marinobacter, Porticoccus and Alcanivorax were exclusive to C. procera rhizosphere.

Taxon: C. proceraCalotropis procerae0
Interactor: MarinobacterMarinobactere0other
Outcome: Marinobacter, Porticoccus and Alcanivorax only exist in rhizosphere microbiomee0
Qualifier: Porticoccus and Alcanivoraxe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Unassigned species of genera Marinobacter, Porticoccus and Alcanivorax only exist in rhizosphere microbiome of C. procera”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1112

Title

Bacterial community dynamics with rhizosphere of Calotropis procera and Senna alexandrina desert plants in Saudi Arabia

Diana AH Al-Quwaie Bioinformation 2020. doi:10.6026/97320630016567

Other claims from this paper (13)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer these microbes produce siderophores that protect C. procera from pathogens.

Taxon: C. proceraCalotropis procerae1
Interactor: MarinobacterMarinobactere1symbiont
Compound: siderophorese0
Outcome: protect plant from pathogense0
Qualifier: Porticoccus and Alcanivoraxe1

Verbatim

e0
“These microbes produce siderophores that protect plant from pathogens.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1580

e1
“Marinobacter, Porticoccus and Alcanivorax genera only exist in rhizosphere microbiome of C. procera.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1509

Title

Bacterial community dynamics with rhizosphere of Calotropis procera and Senna alexandrina desert plants in Saudi Arabia

Diana AH Al-Quwaie Bioinformation 2020. doi:10.6026/97320630016567

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marinobacter dominated bacteria at squaring, at 14.24%.

Taxon: TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage: squaring periode0
Interactor: MarinobacterMarinobactere0other
Outcome: most dominant bacteriae0
Value: 14.24%e0

Verbatim

e0
“the most dominant bacteria at squaring period were Marinobacter, accounting for 14.24%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1225

t0
“Tobacco”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50

Title

Microbial Diversity of Rhizosphere Soil of Tobacco at Different Growth Periods

Zebin Chen; Xi Gao; Li Lin; et al. 2018 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Machinery and Earth Science (BEMES 2018) 2018. doi:10.25236/bemes.2018.004

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Bacterial diversity ranked squaring, decaying, resettling, mature, then vigorous growing periods.
Observation Fungal diversity was highest at maturity and showed a declining trend.
Observation Pseudomonas dominated bacteria at resettling, at 2.70%.
Observation Alcanivorax dominated bacteria at vigorous growth, at 15.55%.
Observation Candidatus Nitrososphaera dominated bacteria at maturity, at 20.16%.
Observation Streptomyces dominated bacteria at decay, at 5.16%.
Observation Dominant bacterial taxa varied across stages.
Observation Bacterial diversity and abundance were higher at mature, vigorous and squaring periods than resettling and decaying.
Observation Aspergillus dominated fungi at resettling, at 12.19%.
Observation Mortierella dominated fungi at vigorous growth, at 4.29%.
Observation Un--s-Fungi sp dominated fungi at maturity, at 2.91%.
Observation Chaetomium dominated fungi at decay, at 3.87%.
Observation Un--s-Tremellomycetes sp dominated fungi at squaring, at 10.24%.
Observation Dominant fungi varied across growth stages.
Observation Fungal species diversity and abundance were highest at resettling relative to four other stages.
Observation Fungal diversity declined over time.

Marinobacteraceae 7 claims

7 claims