Lanariaceae 3 claims

Claim · model-written summary

The precise placement of Blandfordia and Lanaria remains poorly supported.

Taxon

Blandfordia and LanariaBlandfordiaLanariae0

Outcome

precise relationshipse0

Qualifier

poorly supportede0

Verbatim

e0

“the precise relationships of Blandfordia and Lanaria are still poorly supported within the astelioid clade.”

Claim · model-written summary

Lanaria and Lophiola have tectate-columellate exine walls with monosulcate exine-less apertures.

Taxon

Lanaria and LophiolaLanariaLophiolae0

Outcome

tectate-columellate exine walls with monosulcate, exine-less aperturese0

Verbatim

e0

“Lanaria and Lophiola are aberrant within the Haemodoraceae in having tectate-columellate exine walls with monosulcate, exine-less apertures”

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen evidence refutes classifying Lanaria or Lophiola within either Haemodoraceae tribe or Tecophilaeaceae.

Taxon

Lanaria or LophiolaLanariaLophiolae0

Outcome

classification of Lanaria or Lophiola within the tribes Haemodoreae or Conostylideae or within the Tecophilaeaceaee0

Direction

refutede0

Verbatim

e0

“The classification of Lanaria or Lophiola within the tribes Haemodoreae or Conostylideae or within the Tecophilaeaceae is refuted based on palynological evidence”