Claim · model-written summary
NIRS equations explained a high proportion of variability in the fermentation rate, the asymptotic GP and the lag phase of ear samples in calibration.
- Organ / stage
- ear samplese1
- Outcome
- variability related to the fermentation rate (c), the asymptotic GP (A), and the lag phase (L)e1
- Value
- R: 0.81-0.87e1
- Qualifier
- in the calibration sub sete1
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gas production (GP) kinetics for maize ear and stover”
e1“NIRS pre dic tion equations could explain a high proportion of variability related to the fermen ta tion rate (c), the asymptotic GP (A), and the lag phase (L) of ear samples in the calibration sub set (R: 0.81-0.87), while for stover predictive ability was inferior”
Title
S. Kruse; A. Herrmann; R. Loges; et al. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 2008. doi:10.22358/jafs/66636/2008
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Method / resource For stover, NIRS prediction ability was inferior to that for ear samples.
- Method / resource Validation showed satisfactory results only for the fermentation rate, with R of 0.81–0.88.
- Method / resource Validation showed satisfactory results for stover at incubation intervals 3-7, 7-12 and 7-16 h only, with R above 0.74.
- Observation NIRS calibration was acceptable for gas production in several incubation intervals.