Claim · model-written summary
NIRS calibration was acceptable for gas production in several incubation intervals.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gas production (GP) kinetics for maize ear and stover”
e4“NIRS calibration was acceptable for GP in several incubation inter vals”
Title
S. Kruse; A. Herrmann; R. Loges; et al. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 2008. doi:10.22358/jafs/66636/2008
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Method / resource NIRS equations explained a high proportion of variability in the fermentation rate, the asymptotic GP and the lag phase of ear samples in calibration.
- Method / resource For stover, NIRS prediction ability was inferior to that for ear samples.
- Method / resource Validation showed satisfactory results only for the fermentation rate, with R of 0.81–0.88.
- Method / resource Validation showed satisfactory results for stover at incubation intervals 3-7, 7-12 and 7-16 h only, with R above 0.74.