Claim · model-written summary
Water productivity decreased as irrigation frequency rose from 0.5 to 1.0 IW: CPE.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- frequency of irrigatione5
- Outcome
- water productivitye6
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“spring sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”
e5“The sugarcane and sugar yields increased significantly with successive increase in frequency of irrigation from 0.5 to 1.0 IW: CPE”
e6“while reverse trend was observed for water productivity”
Title
KULDEEP SINGH; A.S. BRAR Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i4.4500
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Paired-row trench planting gave 16.1% higher cane and sugar yield than conventional planting.
- Intervention effect Paired-row trench planting gave 13.7% higher sugar yield than conventional planting.
- Intervention effect FIRB planting gave 16.9% higher cane and sugar yield than conventional planting.
- Intervention effect FIRB planting gave 14.1% higher sugar yield than conventional planting.
- Intervention effect Net returns and benefit:cost followed the same trends as cane and sugar yields across planting methods and irrigation schedules.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane and sugar yields increased significantly as irrigation frequency rose from 0.5 to 1.0 IW: CPE.
- Intervention effect The highest cane and sugar yields were recorded in paired-row trench planting irrigated at 1.0 IW: CPE, significantly better than other combinations.
- Intervention effect Paired-row trench planting gave cane yield statistically at par with FIRB and significantly better than conventional planting with 25% less water.