Abstract
The present study on drip irrigation in sugarcane was undertaken to assess crop yield, quality of juice, nutrient uptake and its utilization efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency, and soil moisture status for two crop years at the Research Farm of Water Management, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidhyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (long. 19°45′ to 19°57′ north; lat. 74°18′ to 74°65′ east), India. Drip irrigation at 2-, 3-, and 4-day intervals produced 20, 16 and 13% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) in which the cane yield was 131.4 t ha−1. During the crop growth period, soil moisture depletion was 34–46% in furrow-irrigated treatment and 5–20% in drip-irrigated treatment. Similarly, 108% higher irrigation water use efficiency was achieved in 2-day drip irrigation over furrow irrigation in which the irrigation water efficiency was 787 kg ha−1 cm. Fertilization through drip improved agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency, and apparent recovery considerably more than furrow irrigation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
In sugarcane, drip irrigation at a 2-day interval gave 20% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm CPE (furrow yield 131.4 t/ha).
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e0“Drip irrigation at 2-, 3-, and 4-day intervals produced 20, 16 and 13% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) in which the cane yield was 131.4 t ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
In sugarcane, drip irrigation at a 3-day interval gave 16% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm CPE (furrow yield 131.4 t/ha).
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e0“Drip irrigation at 2-, 3-, and 4-day intervals produced 20, 16 and 13% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) in which the cane yield was 131.4 t ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
In sugarcane, drip irrigation at a 4-day interval gave 13% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm CPE (furrow yield 131.4 t/ha).
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e0“Drip irrigation at 2-, 3-, and 4-day intervals produced 20, 16 and 13% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) in which the cane yield was 131.4 t ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture depletion during crop growth was 5-20% under drip irrigation versus 34-46% under furrow irrigation in sugarcane.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e0“soil moisture depletion was 34–46% in furrow-irrigated treatment and 5–20% in drip-irrigated treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-day drip irrigation gave 108% higher irrigation water use efficiency than furrow irrigation in sugarcane (furrow 787 kg/ha/cm).
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e0“108% higher irrigation water use efficiency was achieved in 2-day drip irrigation over furrow irrigation in which the irrigation water efficiency was 787 kg ha−1 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization through drip improved agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency and apparent recovery considerably more than furrow irrigation in sugarcane.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e0“Fertilization through drip improved agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency, and apparent recovery considerably more than furrow irrigation”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →irrigation · soil: physics · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.