Claim · model-written summary
Sequential propanil followed by CollegoTM produced a lower yield in rice
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTMe3
- Interactor
- jointvetche0weed
- Second interactor
- waterprimrosee0weed
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Qualifier
- poor yielde3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”
e3“The sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTM (a mycoherbicide) gave only fair weed control and produced a poor yield with low economic gain”
Title
CONTROL METHODS OF JOINTVETCH AND WATERPRIMROSE IN RICE
Liu, Lii-Chyuaan; Lozano, J.M.; Persaud, Tillak; et al. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) 1986. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.261356
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Sequential propanil application followed by a 2,4-D and bentazon mixture was among the two best rice weed-control treatments and outyielded all others except the weeded check
- Intervention effect Sequential thiobencarb application followed by a 2,4-D and bentazon mixture was among the two best rice weed-control treatments and outyielded all others except the weeded check
- Observation The best rice weed-control treatments gave no significant economic gain in gross income or net return
- Intervention effect Sequential propanil followed by CollegoTM gave only fair weed control in rice
- Intervention effect Sequential propanil followed by CollegoTM produced a lower economic gain in rice
- Intervention effect Manual weeding produced the higher rice yield
- Intervention effect Manual weeding gave the lowest net return in rice because of the high cost of weeding