Paper · 1986 · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)

CONTROL METHODS OF JOINTVETCH AND WATERPRIMROSE IN RICE

Liu, Lii-Chyuaan; Lozano, J.M.; Persaud, Tillak; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A trial was conducted at the Gurabo Substation, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice. The sequential applications of either propanil [N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) propanamide] or thiobencarb [S-(4- chlorophenyl) methyl diethylcarbamothioate] as an early postemergence, followed by a mixture of [(2,4-dlchlorophenoxy) acetic acld] and bentazon [3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4-(3H) one 2,2-dioxide] were found to be the two best treatments. Both treatments outyielded all others except the weeded check. However, no significant economic gain in terms of gross income and net return was evident for the aforementioned treatments. The sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTM (a mycoherbicide) gave only fair weed control and produced a poor yield with low economic gain. Manual weeding produced the higher yield, but with the least net return due to the high cost of weeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential propanil application followed by a 2,4-D and bentazon mixture was among the two best rice weed-control treatments and outyielded all others except the weeded check

Treatment
sequential applications of either propanile1
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
outyieldede2
Qualifier
except the weeded checke2
Comparator
all otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sequential applications of either propanil [N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) propanamide] or thiobencarb [S-(4- chlorophenyl) methyl diethylcarbamothioate] as an early postemergence, followed by a mixture of [(2,4-dlchlorophenoxy) acetic acld] and bentazon [3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4-(3H) one 2,2-dioxide] were found to be the two best treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–608 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both treatments outyielded all others except the weeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential thiobencarb application followed by a 2,4-D and bentazon mixture was among the two best rice weed-control treatments and outyielded all others except the weeded check

Treatment
thiobencarbe1
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
outyieldede2
Qualifier
except the weeded checke2
Comparator
all otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sequential applications of either propanil [N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) propanamide] or thiobencarb [S-(4- chlorophenyl) methyl diethylcarbamothioate] as an early postemergence, followed by a mixture of [(2,4-dlchlorophenoxy) acetic acld] and bentazon [3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4-(3H) one 2,2-dioxide] were found to be the two best treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–608 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both treatments outyielded all others except the weeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The best rice weed-control treatments gave no significant economic gain in gross income or net return

Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
economic gain in terms of gross income and net returne4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e4

“no significant economic gain in terms of gross income and net return was evident for the aforementioned treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential propanil followed by CollegoTM gave only fair weed control in rice

Treatment
sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTMe3
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
weed controle3
Qualifier
only faire3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e3

“The sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTM (a mycoherbicide) gave only fair weed control and produced a poor yield with low economic gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential propanil followed by CollegoTM produced a lower yield in rice

Treatment
sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTMe3
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Qualifier
poor yielde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e3

“The sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTM (a mycoherbicide) gave only fair weed control and produced a poor yield with low economic gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential propanil followed by CollegoTM produced a lower economic gain in rice

Treatment
sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTMe3
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
economic gaine3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Qualifier
low economic gaine3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e3

“The sequential application of propanil followed by CollegoTM (a mycoherbicide) gave only fair weed control and produced a poor yield with low economic gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual weeding produced the higher rice yield

Treatment
Manual weedinge5
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e5

“Manual weeding produced the higher yield, but with the least net return due to the high cost of weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual weeding gave the lowest net return in rice because of the high cost of weeding

Treatment
Manual weedinge5
Interactor
jointvetche0weed
Second interactor
waterprimrosee0weed
Outcome
net returne5
Direction
lowerinferrede5
Qualifier
due to the high cost of weedinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 · show in text ↑
e5

“Manual weeding produced the higher yield, but with the least net return due to the high cost of weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1058 · show in text ↑

Thiobencarb · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

propanil · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.