Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Peanut yields were similar under the two paraquat mixtures.

A claim from Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Imazethapyr and Metolachlor · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yields were similar under the two paraquat mixtures.

Treatment
paraquat plus imazethapyre0
Outcome
Peanut yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
paraquat plus bentazone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut yields with paraquat plus imazethapyr and paraquat plus bentazon were similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–783

Title

Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Imazethapyr and Metolachlor

John S. Richburg; John W. Wilcut; E. Ford Eastin Weed Technology 1995. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00024258

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-02ec2d8a3d3d7f2c05d25642e8f89d25c8428fe889288d2a1a3df765471f4f31 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

paraquat · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 8 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Paraquat-containing systems increased peanut yields by 230 kg/ha.

    Postemergence Weed Management Systems for Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) · 1990 · compared with herbicide systems not containing paraquat

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.