Claim · model-written summary
The combined eC + eT partly mitigated the adverse effects on foliage production seen under single eT or eC.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes capitataStylosanthes capitatae1
- Treatment
- eC + eTe7
- Outcome
- adverse effects of foliage productione7
- Direction
- mitigatione7
- Comparator
- eT or eCe7
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e1“The regrowth of a C 3 forage Stylosanthes capitata in a rain-fed field”
e7“There was some mitigation of the adverse effects of foliage production of eT or eC in eC + eT”
Title
Rising CO2 in the field does not offset warming or drought constraints on leaf growth of a C3 forage
L. H. G. de Camargo-Bortolin; E. Habermann; P. Vicente; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2020. doi:10.1017/s0014479719000358
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Single eC decreased the area and biomass of foliage per shoot of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eC increased the number of flowers per shoot and flowered ramification of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Association Increased investment in flowering under eC occurred notably when soil water content was higher than 0.30 m3 m-3.
- Intervention effect Single eC increased palisade parenchyma of leaves of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eT impaired the area and biomass of foliage production per shoot of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eT raised shoot mortality of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eT increased spongy leaf parenchyma of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Under combined eC + eT, shoot mortality of Stylosanthes capitata increased.
- Observation Leaf tissue changes under eC or eT, or the partial mitigation under eC + eT, did not offset the constraints on leaf growth per shoot.
- Recommendation The harmful impact of eC, eT or eC + eT on foliage production indicated no advantage for feeding livestock with S. capitata under expected climate change in the field.