Claim · model-written summary
Single eT impaired the area and biomass of foliage production per shoot of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes capitataStylosanthes capitatae1
- Treatment
- Single eT treatmente6
- Outcome
- area or biomass of foliage production per shoote6
- Direction
- impairede6
- Comparator
- current atmospheric conditions (Control)e3
- Setting
- rain-fed fielde1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Verbatim
e1“The regrowth of a C 3 forage Stylosanthes capitata in a rain-fed field”
e3“current atmospheric conditions (Control)”
e6“Single eT treatment also impaired the area or biomass of foliage production per shoot, raised the shoot mortality, and promoted the increment of the spongy leaf parenchyma”
Title
Rising CO2 in the field does not offset warming or drought constraints on leaf growth of a C3 forage
L. H. G. de Camargo-Bortolin; E. Habermann; P. Vicente; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2020. doi:10.1017/s0014479719000358
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Single eC decreased the area and biomass of foliage per shoot of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eC increased the number of flowers per shoot and flowered ramification of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Association Increased investment in flowering under eC occurred notably when soil water content was higher than 0.30 m3 m-3.
- Intervention effect Single eC increased palisade parenchyma of leaves of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eT raised shoot mortality of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect Single eT increased spongy leaf parenchyma of Stylosanthes capitata relative to control.
- Intervention effect The combined eC + eT partly mitigated the adverse effects on foliage production seen under single eT or eC.
- Intervention effect Under combined eC + eT, shoot mortality of Stylosanthes capitata increased.
- Observation Leaf tissue changes under eC or eT, or the partial mitigation under eC + eT, did not offset the constraints on leaf growth per shoot.
- Recommendation The harmful impact of eC, eT or eC + eT on foliage production indicated no advantage for feeding livestock with S. capitata under expected climate change in the field.