Claim · model-written summary
Priming did not affect mean time to harvest.
- Taxon
- Broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicae1 - Treatment
- priming treatmentse0
- Outcome
- mean time to harveste0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All priming treatments, except KNO 3 and mannitol, consistently reduced the mean time to germination in the laboratory, reduced the mean time to field emergence, increased final stands, but did not affect the mean time to harvest”
e1“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L., var. italica, cvs. Brigadier and Earlidawn)”
Title
837 PB 355 A COMPARISON OF BROCCOLI SEED PRIMING TREATMENTS
Lewis W. Jett; Gregory E. Welbaum HortScience 1994. doi:10.21273/hortsci.29.5.553b
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Most priming treatments reduced laboratory mean time to germination.
- Intervention effect Most priming treatments reduced mean time to field emergence.
- Intervention effect Most priming treatments increased final stands.
- Intervention effect Solid phase priming was more effective than osmotic priming at each tested water potential.
- Observation Micro-cel E solid priming mixture at 1.0:0.8:1.8 for seven days was best.
- Intervention effect Other priming at the same water potential was less effective than the best mixture.
- Observation There was no priming effect below a water potential threshold of Ψ= -2.4 MPa.
- Association Priming response was closely associated with treatment water potential but was not entirely dependent on it.