Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of TiO 2 nanoparticles and nutrient sources on yield and physiological traits of cabbage and capsicum

Perminder Singh Brar; Gitika Bhardwaj; Rajesh Kaushal; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Titanium, a beneficial element, has shown potential in promoting plant growth, stress resilience, and nutrient uptake in various crops. This study aims to investigate the effective concentration (500, 1000, and 1500 ppm for cabbage; 50, 100, 150 ppm for capsicum) and application method (seed or foliar) of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2) in combination with different nutrient sources (chemical fertilizers only; integration of chemical fertilizers with vermicompost) on yield and physiological attributes of cabbage and capsicum. The data from two-year open-field experiments, laid out in randomized block design, revealed that application of nano-TiO2 @1000 ppm through seed treatment with integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost significantly increased net head weight, harvest index, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b) in cabbage. On the other hand, foliar application of nano-TiO2 @500 ppm with chemical fertilizer recorded maximum value of gross head weight in cabbage. On the other hand, in capsicum, integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost along with seed treatment of nano-TiO2 @50 ppm enhanced pericarp thickness, ascorbic acid, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b); and foliar spray with nano-TiO2 @100 ppm increased number of fruits per plant, although the effect on ascorbic acid in cabbage and fruit shape index in capsicum was non-significant. Results of study confirmed that yield and physiological metrics of cabbage and capsicum were improved by efficient nutrient management, when nanoparticles are applied along with integration of organic and inorganic sources. The given module fostered the vision of combining sustainable nutrient strategies and nanoparticles application for enhancing vegetable productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed nano-TiO2 at 1000 ppm with chemical fertilizers and vermicompost increased cabbage net head weight and harvest index.

Treatment
nano-TiO2 @1000 ppm through seed treatment with integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicomposte0
Outcome
net head weight, harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of nano-TiO2 @1000 ppm through seed treatment with integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost significantly increased net head weight, harvest index, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b) in cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same cabbage treatment increased protein and chlorophyll contents.

Treatment
nano-TiO2 @1000 ppm through seed treatment with integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicomposte0
Outcome
protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of nano-TiO2 @1000 ppm through seed treatment with integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost significantly increased net head weight, harvest index, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b) in cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-TiO2 at 500 ppm with chemical fertilizer gave maximum gross cabbage head weight.

Treatment
foliar application of nano-TiO2 @500 ppm with chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
gross head weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nano-TiO2 @500 ppm with chemical fertilizer recorded maximum value of gross head weight in cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed nano-TiO2 at 50 ppm with integrated fertilizers enhanced capsicum pericarp thickness.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost along with seed treatment of nano-TiO2 @50 ppme0
Outcome
pericarp thicknesse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost along with seed treatment of nano-TiO2 @50 ppm enhanced pericarp thickness, ascorbic acid, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same capsicum treatment enhanced ascorbic acid, protein and chlorophyll contents.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost along with seed treatment of nano-TiO2 @50 ppme0
Outcome
ascorbic acid, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of chemical fertilizers and vermicompost along with seed treatment of nano-TiO2 @50 ppm enhanced pericarp thickness, ascorbic acid, protein, and chlorophyll contents (a & b)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-TiO2 at 100 ppm increased capsicum fruit number per plant.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
foliar spray with nano-TiO2 @100 ppme0
Outcome
number of fruits per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray with nano-TiO2 @100 ppm increased number of fruits per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect on cabbage ascorbic acid was non-significant.

Outcome
effect on ascorbic acide0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect on ascorbic acid in cabbage and fruit shape index in capsicum was non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect on capsicum fruit shape index was non-significant.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Outcome
fruit shape indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit shape index in capsicum was non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1407 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

application · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 73 positive, 1 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 104 positive, 6 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.