Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Nanobiochar Application in Combination with Mulching Improves Metabolites and Curd Quality Traits in Cauliflower

Naiwen Xue; Sumera Anwar; Fahad Shafiq; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sustainable nutrient management approaches could improve production and quality without affecting soil health. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the interactive effects of mulching (no mulch, plastic mulch, and straw mulch) and nanobiochar (NBC) foliar application on biomass, nutrient contents, and metabolites in the leaf and curd of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). After 20 days of transplantation, NBC (0.1% w/v) was applied as a foliar spray for four consecutive weeks (one spray per week). At the curd initiation stage, changes in chlorophyll, carotenoids, and metabolite concentrations in leaves and curd were determined. The application of nanobiochar significantly enhanced the curd weight and improved curd morphology. Yield traits including curd weight, curd diameter, basal diameter, and stalk length were increased by 30, 13, 16, and 20% by NBC application compared to control. Plastic mulching also increased the aboveground biomass by 32% when compared to no mulching. Moreover, plastic mulching and nanobiochar prominently enhanced root dry weight, curd weight, rough solidity index, total soluble sugar in leaf and curd, calcium in curd, and potassium in leaf and curd of cauliflower. Overall, this study revealed the potential of the foliar application of NBC in promoting the biomass and nutritional properties of cauliflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanobiochar increased cauliflower curd weight by 30% relative to control.

Treatment
NBC applicatione0
Outcome
curd weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd weight, curd diameter, basal diameter, and stalk length were increased by 30, 13, 16, and 20% by NBC application compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanobiochar increased cauliflower curd diameter by 13% relative to control.

Treatment
NBC applicatione0
Outcome
curd diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd weight, curd diameter, basal diameter, and stalk length were increased by 30, 13, 16, and 20% by NBC application compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanobiochar increased cauliflower basal diameter by 16% relative to control.

Treatment
NBC applicatione0
Outcome
basal diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd weight, curd diameter, basal diameter, and stalk length were increased by 30, 13, 16, and 20% by NBC application compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanobiochar increased cauliflower stalk length by 20% relative to control.

Treatment
NBC applicatione0
Outcome
stalk lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd weight, curd diameter, basal diameter, and stalk length were increased by 30, 13, 16, and 20% by NBC application compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanobiochar improved cauliflower curd morphology.

Treatment
nanobiochare0
Outcome
curd morphologye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nanobiochar significantly enhanced the curd weight and improved curd morphology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased cauliflower aboveground biomass by 32% compared with no mulch.

Treatment
Plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
no mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic mulching also increased the aboveground biomass by 32% when compared to no mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and nanobiochar enhanced cauliflower root dry weight, curd weight and rough solidity index.

Treatment
plastic mulching and nanobiochare0
Outcome
root dry weight, curd weight, rough solidity indexe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
no mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and nanobiochar prominently enhanced root dry weight, curd weight, rough solidity index, total soluble sugar in leaf and curd, calcium in curd, and potassium in leaf and curd of cauliflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“We conducted a field experiment to investigate the interactive effects of mulching (no mulch, plastic mulch, and straw mulch) and nanobiochar (NBC) foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and nanobiochar enhanced cauliflower leaf and curd soluble sugar.

Treatment
plastic mulching and nanobiochare0
Outcome
total soluble sugar in leaf and curde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
no mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and nanobiochar prominently enhanced root dry weight, curd weight, rough solidity index, total soluble sugar in leaf and curd, calcium in curd, and potassium in leaf and curd of cauliflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“We conducted a field experiment to investigate the interactive effects of mulching (no mulch, plastic mulch, and straw mulch) and nanobiochar (NBC) foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and nanobiochar enhanced calcium in cauliflower curds and potassium in leaves and curds.

Treatment
plastic mulching and nanobiochare0
Outcome
calcium in curd, and potassium in leaf and curde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
no mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and nanobiochar prominently enhanced root dry weight, curd weight, rough solidity index, total soluble sugar in leaf and curd, calcium in curd, and potassium in leaf and curd of cauliflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“We conducted a field experiment to investigate the interactive effects of mulching (no mulch, plastic mulch, and straw mulch) and nanobiochar (NBC) foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–277 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

61 papers: 49 positive, 12 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

mulching · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.