Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After seed soaking, no stripe rust occurred during tillering.

A claim from Inhibition Effect of Seed Soaking with Extract of Stellera chamaejasme on Wheat Stripe Rust · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After seed soaking, no stripe rust occurred during tillering.

Organ / stage
tillering stagee0
Treatment
seed soakinge0
Outcome
no stripe rust was occurrede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79
e0

“after seed soaking,no stripe rust was occurred during tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–582

Title

Inhibition Effect of Seed Soaking with Extract of Stellera chamaejasme on Wheat Stripe Rust

YI Jun-qiang Hubei nongye kexue 2011

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-0440acf415cfbd9de9963b4ad27a908ea4b096f602eda5f90f88830f0f5d07e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Seed treatment with Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP did not reduce wheat black point incidence compared with untreated controls.

    Effect of seed treatment and foliar spray with fungicides in controlling black point disease of wheat · 1970 · compared with Untreated and unsprayed controls

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Seed treatments did not control wheat-streak mosaic when viruliferous mites were repeatedly introduced.

    Chemical Control Studies of the Wheat Curl Mite1 · 1958

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Seed treatment did not influence subsequent mildew, sharp eyespot, or eyespot.

    Effects of Seed Treatments on Septoria nodorum Infection of Winter Wheat · 1977

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    ZnO priming alone did not induce visible defense responses.

    Intergenerational defense priming in wheat using ZnO nanoparticles against spot blotch · 2026

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Seed treatment was not effective in reducing HLB severity and increasing wheat grain yield, whereas foliar fungicide spray was.

    Effects of Seed Treatment and Foliar Fungicides on Helminthosporium Leaf Blight and on Performance of Wheat in Warmer Growing Conditions · 2005 · compared with foliar fungicide spray

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Seed priming improved antioxidative defense in water-stressed wheat.

    Use of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Better Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Water Deficit Conditions: Growth, Osmoregulation, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism · 2020

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Priming reduced the severity of salinity effects on wheat.

    THE EFFECTS OF SEED SOAKING WITH PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON SEEDLING VIGOR OF WHEAT UNDER SALINITY STRESS · 2005

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Hormonal priming reduced the severity of the salinity effect on wheat.

    ALLEVIATION OF SALINITY STRESS IN SPRING WHEAT BY HORMONAL PRIMING WITH ABA , SALISALIC ACID AND ASCORBIC ACID · 2006

    Same direction

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.