Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed priming improved antioxidative defense in water-stressed wheat.

A claim from Use of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Better Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Water Deficit Conditions: Growth, Osmoregulation, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved antioxidative defense in water-stressed wheat.

Treatment
seed priminge1
Outcome
antioxidative defense mechanisme0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by improving the Ψw, Ψs, Ψp, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation (GB and Pro), TSP, and the antioxidative defense mechanism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1209
e1

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1012
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67

Title

Use of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Better Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Water Deficit Conditions: Growth, Osmoregulation, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism

Noman Habib; Qasim Ali; Shafaqat Ali; et al. Plants 2020. doi:10.3390/plants9020285

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-6c454de8ddef7e85780f1b4fe79c7f06d283d5b9802713d4c5916190da6cfe0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Seed treatment with Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP did not reduce wheat black point incidence compared with untreated controls.

    Effect of seed treatment and foliar spray with fungicides in controlling black point disease of wheat · 1970 · compared with Untreated and unsprayed controls

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Seed treatments did not control wheat-streak mosaic when viruliferous mites were repeatedly introduced.

    Chemical Control Studies of the Wheat Curl Mite1 · 1958

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Seed treatment did not influence subsequent mildew, sharp eyespot, or eyespot.

    Effects of Seed Treatments on Septoria nodorum Infection of Winter Wheat · 1977

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    ZnO priming alone did not induce visible defense responses.

    Intergenerational defense priming in wheat using ZnO nanoparticles against spot blotch · 2026

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Seed treatment was not effective in reducing HLB severity and increasing wheat grain yield, whereas foliar fungicide spray was.

    Effects of Seed Treatment and Foliar Fungicides on Helminthosporium Leaf Blight and on Performance of Wheat in Warmer Growing Conditions · 2005 · compared with foliar fungicide spray

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Priming reduced the severity of salinity effects on wheat.

    THE EFFECTS OF SEED SOAKING WITH PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON SEEDLING VIGOR OF WHEAT UNDER SALINITY STRESS · 2005

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Hormonal priming reduced the severity of the salinity effect on wheat.

    ALLEVIATION OF SALINITY STRESS IN SPRING WHEAT BY HORMONAL PRIMING WITH ABA , SALISALIC ACID AND ASCORBIC ACID · 2006

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Triadimenol seed treatments lowered mildew severity in winter wheat.

    Effects of Powdery Mildew, Triadimenol Seed Treatment, and Triadimefon Foliar Sprays on Yield of Winter Wheat in North Carolina · 1989

    Same direction

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.