Paper · 2020 · Plants

Use of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Better Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Water Deficit Conditions: Growth, Osmoregulation, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism

Noman Habib; Qasim Ali; Shafaqat Ali; et al.

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
164
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present experiment was carried out to study the influences of exogenously-applied nitric oxide (NO) donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as seed primers on growth and yield in relation with different physio-biochemical parameters, antioxidant activities, and osmolyte accumulation in wheat plants grown under control (100% field capacity) and water stress (60% field capacity) conditions. During soaking, the seeds were covered and kept in completely dark. Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth, grain yield, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble proteins (TSP), leaf water potential (Ψw), leaf turgor potential (Ψp), osmotic potential (Ψs), and leaf relative water content (LRWC), while it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants and the accumulation of leaf ascorbic acid (AsA), proline (Pro), glycine betaine (GB), malondialdehyde (MDA), and H2O2. However, seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated the deleterious effects of water stress on growth and yield by improving the Ψw, Ψs, Ψp, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation (GB and Pro), TSP, and the antioxidative defense mechanism. Furthermore, the application of NO and H2O2 as seed primers also reduced the accumulation of H2O2 and MDA contents. The effectiveness was treatment-specific and the combined application was also found to be effective. The results revealed that exogenous application of NO and H2O2 was effective in increasing the tolerance of wheat plants under drought stress in terms of growth and grain yield by regulating plant–water relations, the antioxidative defense mechanism, and accumulation of osmolytes, and by reducing the membrane lipid peroxidation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced wheat growth and grain yield.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
plant growth, grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth, grain yield, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble proteins (TSP), leaf water potential (Ψw), leaf turgor potential (Ψp), osmotic potential (Ψs), and leaf relative water content (LRWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf pigments, phenolics and soluble protein in wheat.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigments, total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble proteins (TSP)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth, grain yield, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble proteins (TSP), leaf water potential (Ψw), leaf turgor potential (Ψp), osmotic potential (Ψs), and leaf relative water content (LRWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf water, turgor and osmotic potential in wheat.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf water potential (Ψw), leaf turgor potential (Ψp), osmotic potential (Ψs)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth, grain yield, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble proteins (TSP), leaf water potential (Ψw), leaf turgor potential (Ψp), osmotic potential (Ψs), and leaf relative water content (LRWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced wheat leaf relative water content.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf relative water content (LRWC)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth, grain yield, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble proteins (TSP), leaf water potential (Ψw), leaf turgor potential (Ψp), osmotic potential (Ψs), and leaf relative water content (LRWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased antioxidant enzyme activities and ascorbic acid accumulation.

Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
activities of enzymatic antioxidants and the accumulation of leaf ascorbic acid (AsA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants and the accumulation of leaf ascorbic acid (AsA), proline (Pro), glycine betaine (GB), malondialdehyde (MDA), and H2O2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline, glycine betaine and malondialdehyde accumulation.

Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
proline (Pro), glycine betaine (GB), malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants and the accumulation of leaf ascorbic acid (AsA), proline (Pro), glycine betaine (GB), malondialdehyde (MDA), and H2O2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased hydrogen peroxide accumulation.

Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
H2O2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants and the accumulation of leaf ascorbic acid (AsA), proline (Pro), glycine betaine (GB), malondialdehyde (MDA), and H2O2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress markedly reduced the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP seed priming mitigated drought effects on wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
seed priming with SNPe0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated the deleterious effects of water stress on growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 seed priming mitigated drought effects on wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
H2O2e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated the deleterious effects of water stress on growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined SNP and H2O2 seed priming mitigated drought effects on wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
seed priming with SNP and H2O2e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated the deleterious effects of water stress on growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved water potentials and photosynthetic pigments under water stress.

Treatment
seed priminge1
Outcome
Ψw, Ψs, Ψpe0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by improving the Ψw, Ψs, Ψp, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation (GB and Pro), TSP, and the antioxidative defense mechanism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved photosynthetic pigments, osmolyte accumulation and soluble protein.

Treatment
seed priminge1
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation (GB and Pro), TSPe0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by improving the Ψw, Ψs, Ψp, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation (GB and Pro), TSP, and the antioxidative defense mechanism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved antioxidative defense in water-stressed wheat.

Treatment
seed priminge1
Outcome
antioxidative defense mechanisme0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by improving the Ψw, Ψs, Ψp, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation (GB and Pro), TSP, and the antioxidative defense mechanism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed priming with SNP and H2O2 alone and in combination mitigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO and H2O2 seed priming reduced hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde accumulation.

Treatment
application of NO and H2O2 as seed primerse0
Outcome
accumulation of H2O2 and MDA contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of NO and H2O2 as seed primers also reduced the accumulation of H2O2 and MDA contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 18 positive, 110 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.