Paper · 2000 · Biologia Plantarum

Induction of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Activity by Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment in Tolerant and Susceptible Wheat Genotypes

R.K. Sairam; G.C. Srivastava

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
89
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We induced an oxidative stress by means of exogenous hydrogen peroxide in two wheat genotypes, C 306 (tolerant to water stress) and Hira (susceptible to water stress), and investigated oxidative injury and changes in antioxidant enzymes activity. H2O2 treatment caused chlorophyll degradation, lipid peroxidation, decreased membrane stability and activity of nitrate reductase. Hydrogen peroxide increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes, glutathione reductase and catalase. These effects increased with increasing H2O2 concentrations. However, no change was observed in the activity of superoxide dismutase and proline accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 treatment caused chlorophyll degradation and lipid peroxidation in wheat genotypes.

Treatment
H2O2 treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradation, lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“H2O2 treatment caused chlorophyll degradation, lipid peroxidation, decreased membrane stability and activity of nitrate reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 treatment decreased membrane stability and nitrate reductase activity in wheat genotypes.

Treatment
H2O2 treatmente0
Outcome
membrane stability and activity of nitrate reductasee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“H2O2 treatment caused chlorophyll degradation, lipid peroxidation, decreased membrane stability and activity of nitrate reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide increased the activity of the antioxidant enzymes glutathione reductase and catalase in wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymes, glutathione reductase and catalasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hydrogen peroxide increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes, glutathione reductase and catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–477 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2O2-induced effects in wheat genotypes increased with increasing H2O2 concentrations.

Treatment
increasing H2O2 concentrationse0
Outcome
These effectse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“These effects increased with increasing H2O2 concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 treatment caused no change in superoxide dismutase activity or proline accumulation in wheat genotypes.

Treatment
H2O2 treatmente0
Outcome
activity of superoxide dismutase and proline accumulatione1
Direction
no changee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“H2O2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“no change was observed in the activity of superoxide dismutase and proline accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–636 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.