Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PSB inoculation increased wheat yield by up to 14.42% compared with the control in phosphate fertilizer-used farmland.

A claim from Screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and their abilities of phosphorus solubilization and wheat growth promotion · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB inoculation increased wheat yield by up to 14.42% compared with the control in phosphate fertilizer-used farmland.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
PSB inoculatione1
Interactor
Phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.42%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1
Setting
phosphate fertilizer-used farmlande1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) can enhance plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–74
e1

“The yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under PSB inoculation significantly increased up to 14.42% (P < 0.05) compared with the control treatment in phosphate fertilizer-used farmland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–729

Title

Screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and their abilities of phosphorus solubilization and wheat growth promotion

Zhonghua Wang; Huihong Zhang; Lu Liu; et al. BMC Microbiology 2022. doi:10.1186/s12866-022-02715-7

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-05492d2bb41befbab6f4cdc4b189f1d2b11e844920fb39d7c20bc94a30738a45 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Bacterial inoculation improved wheat spike biomass with RP3 and RP4.

    Improving the efficiency of phosphate rocks combined with phosphate solubilizing Actinomycetota to increase wheat growth under alkaline and acidic soils · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Twice-split phosphorus application increased final wheat yield by 5.5~7.3%.

    Twice-Split Phosphorus Application Alleviates Low Temperature Stress by Improving Root Physiology and Phosphorus Accumulation, Translocation, and Partitioning in Wheat · 2023 · compared with conventional phosphorus application (R1)

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Low phosphorus stress reduced tiller number in Kenong 199 wheat.

    Transcriptome analysis of axillary buds in low phosphorus stress and functional analysis of TaWRKY74s in wheat · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    RAC875 had higher grain yield than Wyalkatchem at maturity under low phosphorus.

    Variation in root system architecture and morphology of two wheat genotypes is a predictor of their tolerance to phosphorus deficiency · 2019

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. no effect
    Neither nitrogen nor phosphorus produced a significant grain yield response.

    Water use, growth and yield of wheat in a subtropical environment · 1980

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Incorporating P and K into the subsoil did not further change wheat yield.

    The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation · 1979

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Applications of multiple nutrients did not significantly increase wheat yield.

    Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987

    Opposite direction

563 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Fusarium inoculation significantly lowered winter wheat yield by 24.2-45.0% relative to uninoculated check plots.

    Effects of Field Application of Tebuconazole on Yield, Yield Components and the Mycotoxin Content of Fusarium-infected Wheat Grain · 2000 · compared with Check plots

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced wheat yield.

    Fusarium ear blight of wheat: the use of quantitative PCR and visual disease assessment in studies of disease control · 1999

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Biofertilizer as a soil mix reduced wheat growth and yield versus conventional N.

    Chemical and Biological Enhancement Effects of Biochar on Wheat Growth and Yield under Arid Field Conditions · 2021 · compared with control (conventional N fertilization)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Inoculation had negligible effect on grain yield and nitrogen uptake.

    Effects of Field Inoculation with VAM and Bacteria Consortia on Root Growth and Nutrients Uptake in Common Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    In field plots, WSMV reduced forage yield in susceptible wheat.

    Effects of Wheat streak mosaic virus on Root Development and Water-Use Efficiency of Hard Red Winter Wheat · 2010 · compared with noninoculated plots

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Locally adapted and Australian standards showed comparable yield reduction after inoculation.

    Variability of Fusarium Crown Rot Tolerances Among Cultivars of Spring and Winter Wheat · 2009 · compared with Australian standards

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculated and control wheat plants did not differ in dry matter production or total N content.

    Alteration of size of wheat root systems and nitrogen fixation by associative nitrogen-fixing bacteria measured under field conditions · 1988 · compared with control plants

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Pathogen inoculations reduced wheat 1000-kernel weight, weight and number of kernels per head.

    Fusarium Head Blight of Common Polish Winter Wheat Cultivars – Comparison of Effects of Fusarium avenaceum and Fusarium culmorum on Yield Components · 2002

    Opposite direction

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.