Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil copper fertilisation at 8 and 12 kg Cu per ha significantly increased rapeseed yield relative to the no-copper control.

A claim from EFFECT OF FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION OF COPPER ON THE LEVEL AND QUALITY OF WINTER RAPESEED YIELDS · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil copper fertilisation at 8 and 12 kg Cu per ha significantly increased rapeseed yield relative to the no-copper control.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
fertilised to the soil with doses of 8 and 12 kg Cu⋅ha -1e0
Outcome
rapeseed yieldse0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
control treatment (without Cu)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in rapeseed yields, compared to the control treatment (without Cu), were obtained in treatments fertilised to the soil with doses of 8 and 12 kg Cu⋅ha -1 and in the treatment with foliar spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1104

Title

EFFECT OF FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION OF COPPER ON THE LEVEL AND QUALITY OF WINTER RAPESEED YIELDS

U. Sienkiewicz-Cholewa Journal of Elementology 2008

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-06d60eb96ebaf8ae5e0a5081e7196f389a13a3d6e4252acfb268dcc3fc112f06 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this claim · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.