Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native Pseudomonas PGPR significantly improved growth and symbiotic parameters compared with single Mesorhizobium inoculants in both varieties.

A claim from Co-inoculation ofMesorhizobiumsp. and plant growth promoting rhizobacteriaPseudomonassp. as bio-enhancer and bio-fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native Pseudomonas PGPR significantly improved growth and symbiotic parameters compared with single Mesorhizobium inoculants in both varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
both varietiese1
Treatment
co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPRe1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium sp.Mesorhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
growth and symbiotic parameterse1
Direction
Significant improvemente1
Comparator
single inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp.e1
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under field conditions in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–377
e1

“Significant improvement in growth and symbiotic parameters was observed with co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPR as compared to single inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp. in both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–628

Title

Co-inoculation ofMesorhizobiumsp. and plant growth promoting rhizobacteriaPseudomonassp. as bio-enhancer and bio-fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)

Navprabhjot Kaur; Poonam Sharma; Sunita Sharma Legume Research - An International Journal 2015. doi:10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00099.5

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-078d91c3cc146c8e0afca581a793ec0b0c09f8c11fa264d7aa37e0c20b9e9420 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Pseudomonas inoculation increased chickpea biomass at 2 mM nickel.

    Enhancement of plant growth and decontamination of nickel‐spiked soil using PGPR · 2008 · compared with uninoculated plants

    Same direction

  2. positive
    MP1 significantly increased shoot and root lengths and fresh weight in Cicer arietinum relative to controls.

    Relative plant growth promoting potential of Himalayan Psychrotolerant Pseudomonas jesenii strain MP1 against native Cicer arietinum (L.)., Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper; Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek., Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. and Eleusine coracana (L.)Gaertn. · 2014 · compared with untreated controls

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Pseudomonas treatment significantly increased chickpea plant height.

    Effect of Iron Availability on Induction of Systemic Resistance toFusariumWilt of Chickpea byPseudomonasspp. · 2005

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Pseudomonas sp. RCP1 significantly enhanced plant growth parameters.

    Exploration of plant growth‐promoting endophytic bacteria from Pisum sativum and Cicer arietinum from South–West Haryana · 2022

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Pseudomonas strain 153 gave the maximum plant height in chickpea.

    Effects of the Rhizobium and PGPRs Bacterium on Seed Yield and Yield Components in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2012

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Co-inoculation improved growth and symbiotic parameters relative to Mesorhizobium alone in both varieties.

    Co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas sp. as bio-enhancer and bio-fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2015 · compared with single inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp.

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The combined microbial priming treatment gave the highest plant height, 40.9.

    Influence of Priming on Growth, Yield and Seed Quality Parameters in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2019 · compared with above treatments tested

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Three fluorescent Pseudomonas strains consistently increased chickpea seed germination.

    Characterization and Field Evaluation of Potential Fluorescent Pseudomonas Isolates on Growth and Yield Attributing Characters in Chickpea · 2024

    Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Mesorhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    The same combination significantly increased root and shoot dry weights in glasshouse pots.

    Enhancement of Nodulation and Yield of Chickpea by Co-inoculation of IndigenousMesorhizobiumspp. and Plant Growth–Promoting Rhizobacteria in Eastern Uttar Pradesh · 2012 · compared with control

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced chickpea growth parameters under water stress.

    Efficacy of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase-producing rhizobacteria in ameliorating water stress in chickpea under axenic conditions · 2013

    Same direction

  3. positive
    MA72 plus P1S6 increased chickpea shoot dry weight by 192%.

    Co-Inoculation of Mesorhizobium ciceri with Either Bacillus sp. or Enterobacter aerogenes on Chickpea Improves Growth and Productivity in Phosphate-Deficient Soils in Dry Areas of a Mediterranean Region · 2021

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Mesorhizobium isolate MBD26 increased shoot dry weight by 49.52% without salt after 80 days.

    Inducing salinity tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by inoculation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase-containing Mesorhizobium strains · 2015

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Mesorhizobium sp. alone increased plant dry weight in chickpea by 33.6 over uninoculated control.

    Effect of inoculation methods of Mesorhizobium ciceri and PGPR in chickpea (Cicer areietinum L.) on symbiotic traits, yields, nutrient uptake and soil properties · 2013 · compared with uninoculated control

    Same direction

  6. positive
    MBD26 and RHD18 coinoculation increased plant dry weight 112.9% at 50 days without salt.

    Amelioration of salt stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by coinculation of ACC deaminase-containing rhizospheric bacteria with Mesorhizobium strains · 2016 · compared with uninoculated control plants

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Treatments inoculated with Mesorhizobium sp. Cicer alone or along with Captan, Chlorpyrifos or Endosulfan showed improved plant growth and symbiotic parameters (plant height, nodulation, leghaemoglobin content, and nitrogen content) in comparison with the uninoculated control treatment

    Influence of pesticide-treated seeds on survival of Mesorhizobium sp. Cicer, symbiotic efficiency and yield in chickpea · 2012 · compared with uninoculated control treatment

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Ps45, Ps47 and Ba1a with Mesorhizobium promoted seed emergence.

    Biological Management of Vascular Wilt of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Incited by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris by Antagonistic Rhizobacteria Co-Inoculated with Native Mesorhizobium · 2018

    Same direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Relative growth rate was not significantly influenced by biofertilizer and phosphorus treatments.

    Effect of Mesorhizobium, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and phosphorus on plant biometery and growth indices of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2017

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Co-inoculated chickpea produced 3456 kg ha-1 biomass versus 2903 kg ha-1 in controls at 15 kg N ha-1.

    Co-inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri and Azotobacter chroococcum for improving growth, nodulation and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2009 · compared with control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Rhizobial inoculation improved shoot dry weight (SDW) by +7.67 g plant −1 under sub‐humid conditions.

    Effect of bio‐fertilization and edapho‐climatic conditions on chickpea nodulation, grain yields, and seed protein in a Mediterranean context: a meta‐analysis approach · 2026

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. negative
    Rhizobacterial seed and soil treatment delayed chickpea seedling emergence relative to controls.

    Influence of temperature on plant–rhizobacteria interactions related to biocontrol potential for suppression of fusarium wilt of chickpea · 2004 · compared with nontreated controls

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation alone gave the lowest chickpea shoot and root dry biomass.

    Effect of soil amendment with Chenopodium album dry biomass and two Trichoderma species on growth of chickpea var. Noor 2009 in Sclerotium rolfsii contaminated soil · 2020 · compared with without any soil amendment

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Inoculation with non-AM fungal endophytes had a neutral effect on chickpea biomass.

    Genotypic variation in the response of chickpea to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and non-mycorrhizal fungal endophytes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    S. rolfsii reduced shoot dry weight by 21.4% versus negative control.

    ALLEVIATING STRESS OF SCLERTIUM ROLFSII ON GROWTH OF CHICKPEA VAR. BHAKKAR-2011 BY TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM AND T. VIRIDE · 2021 · compared with negative control

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Combined nematode and fungal inocula had an additive effect on chickpea growth.

    Interaction of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceri and F. solani on chickpea1 · 1987

    Opposite direction

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.