Abstract
The present investigation was undertaken to study the synergistic effect of recommended Mesorhizobium sp. (LGR -33) (Meso) and native potential PGPR Pseudomonas sp. (PGPR 2 and PGPR 3) along with reference strain Pseudomonas diminuta (LK884) on bio-enhancing activity, symbiotic parameters and grain yield in desi (PBG 1) and kabuli (BG 1053) under field conditions in chickpea during rabi 2009-2010. Significant improvement in growth and symbiotic parameters was observed with co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPR as compared to single inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp. in both varieties. Maximum improvement in symbiotic parameters was observed with co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR 3 followed by native PGPR 2 as compared to LK884 (reference). On an average, co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with PGPR 3 improved the yield by 7.0% (desi) and 5.3% (kabuli) over Mesorhizobium sp. alone. It appears that native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPR can be explored as potent bio-enhancers and bio-fertilizers along with Mesorhizobium sp. in chickpea under low input technology programme of sustainable agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation improved growth and symbiotic parameters relative to Mesorhizobium alone in both varieties.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPRe0
- Interactor
- Mesorhizobium sp.
.jpg?width=60)
Mesorhizobiume0symbiont - Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonase0symbiont - Outcome
- growth and symbiotic parameterse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- single inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp.e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Significant improvement in growth and symbiotic parameters was observed with co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPR as compared to single inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp. in both varieties”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Mesorhizobium plus PGPR 3 gave the maximum symbiotic parameter improvement.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR 3e0
- Interactor
- Mesorhizobium sp.Mesorhizobiume0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPR 3e0symbiont
- Outcome
- symbiotic parameterse0
- Direction
- Maximum improvemente0
- Comparator
- LK884e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum improvement in symbiotic parameters was observed with co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR 3 followed by native PGPR 2 as compared to LK884 (reference)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Mesorhizobium plus native PGPR 2 ranked next for symbiotic parameter improvement relative to LK884.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- native PGPR 2e0
- Interactor
- Mesorhizobium sp.Mesorhizobiume0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPR 2e0symbiont
- Outcome
- symbiotic parameterse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- LK884e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum improvement in symbiotic parameters was observed with co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR 3 followed by native PGPR 2 as compared to LK884 (reference)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Mesorhizobium plus PGPR 3 improved desi yield by 7.0% over Mesorhizobium alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- desie0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with PGPR 3e0
- Interactor
- Mesorhizobium sp.Mesorhizobiume0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPR 3e0symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 7.0%e0
- Comparator
- Mesorhizobium sp. alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with PGPR 3 improved the yield by 7.0% (desi) and 5.3% (kabuli) over Mesorhizobium sp. alone”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Mesorhizobium plus PGPR 3 improved kabuli yield by 5.3% over Mesorhizobium alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- kabulie0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with PGPR 3e0
- Interactor
- Mesorhizobium sp.Mesorhizobiume0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPR 3e0symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 5.3%e0
- Comparator
- Mesorhizobium sp. alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. with PGPR 3 improved the yield by 7.0% (desi) and 5.3% (kabuli) over Mesorhizobium sp. alone”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose native Pseudomonas PGPR as chickpea bio-enhancers and bio-fertilizers with Mesorhizobium.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Mesorhizobium sp.Mesorhizobiume0symbiont
- Outcome
- can be explored as potent bio-enhancers and bio-fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“native potential Pseudomonas sp. PGPR can be explored as potent bio-enhancers and bio-fertilizers along with Mesorhizobium sp. in chickpea under low input technology programme of sustainable agriculture”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Mesorhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Mesorhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- negative
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →inoculation · Mesorhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.