Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Alternative fertilization had no effect on fruit size and yield of peach and nectarine cultivars compared with farmer practice.

A claim from Alternative fertilization effects on peach and nectarine plant and fruit characteristics · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative fertilization had no effect on fruit size and yield of peach and nectarine cultivars compared with farmer practice.

Material
‘Onora’ peach and ‘Big Top’ nectarinee0
Treatment
Alternative fertilizatione1
Outcome
fruit size and yielde1
Direction
no effectse1
Comparator
farmer’s traditional practice (Control)e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Onora’ peach and ‘Big Top’ nectarine mature trees, based on leaf and soil analyses, vegetative growth and expected yield, compared to farmer’s traditional practice (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–323
e1

“Alternative fertilization had no effects on fruit size and yield of the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–815

Title

Alternative fertilization effects on peach and nectarine plant and fruit characteristics

P. Maletsika; N. Tserlikakis; T. Georgoudaki; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2022.1352.74

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-07ae09c858d8b283f08d145f05102aeb0297c96ed71f2896a6dbd87a4171dcd8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.