Paper · 1997 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Nitrogen Stimulated Increases in Peach Yields Are Associated with Extended Fruit Development Period and Increased Fruit Sink Capacity

J.L. Saenz; T.M. DeJong; S.A. Weinbaum

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was designed to characterize the mechanisms of N-stimulated peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch productivity. The effects of N fertilization on potential assimilate availability (source capacity) and on the growth capacity of individual fruit (sink capacity) were assessed. On heavily thinned trees, fertilization did not stimulate fruit growth rates relative to those on nonfertilized trees, suggesting that fruit growth rates were not assimilate-limited throughout the period of fruit development. However, N fertilization resulted in a longer fruit development period and increased the growth potential of individual fruit by 20% (fresh mass) and 15% (dry mass) vs. controls. In unthinned trees, N fertilization increased total fruit yield by 49% (fresh mass) and 40% (dry mass) compared to the unthinned, nonfertilized controls. N fertilization increased total fruit yield per tree in unthinned peach trees by extending the fruit development period and thus increasing the amount of assimilate accumulated for fruit growth. The fruit development period was prolonged both by assimilate deprivation associated with increasingly higher crop loads and by N fertilization. Thus, the prolongation of the peach fruit development period by N-fertilization appears inconsistent with the role of N in increasing assimilate availability for fruit growth. We conclude that N fertilization stimulates peach yields by increasing the period for fruits to use assimilates (sink capacity). The effect of N on assimilate availability was not directly evaluated. The timing of fertilizer N availability did not influence fruit growth potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not stimulate fruit growth rates in heavily thinned peach trees.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit growth ratese0
Direction
did not stimulatee0
Qualifier
heavily thinned treese0
Comparator
nonfertilized treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On heavily thinned trees, fertilization did not stimulate fruit growth rates relative to those on nonfertilized trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization lengthened the peach fruit development period.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit development periode0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization resulted in a longer fruit development period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased individual peach fruit fresh mass growth potential by 20% versus controls.

Treatment
N fertilizatione2
Outcome
growth potential of individual fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
fresh masse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the growth potential of individual fruit by 20% (fresh mass) and 15% (dry mass) vs. controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“N fertilization resulted in a longer fruit development period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased individual peach fruit dry mass growth potential by 15% versus controls.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
growth potential of individual fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
dry masse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization resulted in a longer fruit development period and increased the growth potential of individual fruit by 20% (fresh mass) and 15% (dry mass) vs. controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased fresh mass peach yield in unthinned trees by 49%.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49%e0
Qualifier
fresh masse0
Comparator
unthinned, nonfertilized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In unthinned trees, N fertilization increased total fruit yield by 49% (fresh mass) and 40% (dry mass) compared to the unthinned, nonfertilized controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased dry mass peach yield in unthinned trees by 40%.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
dry masse0
Comparator
unthinned, nonfertilized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In unthinned trees, N fertilization increased total fruit yield by 49% (fresh mass) and 40% (dry mass) compared to the unthinned, nonfertilized controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher crop loads prolonged the peach fruit development period through assimilate deprivation.

Outcome
fruit development periode0
Qualifier
assimilate deprivation associated with increasingly higher crop loadse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit development period was prolonged both by assimilate deprivation associated with increasingly higher crop loads and by N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1179 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute nitrogen stimulated peach yield to an extended period for fruit to use assimilates.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
peach yieldse0
Qualifier
increasing the period for fruits to use assimilates (sink capacity)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization stimulates peach yields by increasing the period for fruits to use assimilates (sink capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen timing did not influence peach fruit growth potential.

Treatment
timing of fertilizer N availabilitye0
Outcome
fruit growth potentiale0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The timing of fertilizer N availability did not influence fruit growth potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1637 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–103 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.