`Riesling' did not survive desiccation

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: grapet0
Material: `Riesling'e0
Outcome: did not survive desiccatione0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“`Riesling' did not survive desiccation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–919

t0
“GRAPE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33

Title

CRYOPRESERVATION OF DORMANT GRAPE (Vitis sp.) BUDS.

Virgil Esensee; Cecil Stushnoff; Philip L. Forsline HortScience 1990. doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.9.1090e

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource was not effective with `Valiant' grape
Method / resource Direct immersion of desiccated samples resulted in survival for some buds of `Valiant'
Method / resource V. riparia showed some survival when field hydrated and at 25% water
Method / resource all buds desiccated to 18% survived
Observation `Riesling' did not survive desiccation, and was killed by all -196 C treatments
Method / resource The apple protocol was partially effective, in combination with desiccation to 18% in `Valiant'

Record rev-08e33b896ddbc4b42d9e3f24a8e23b5ef3ae9cba7b676f942abf1e60304fd142 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer