Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wide ridges with 1.0 C.P.E. gave highest grain yield of 6761 and 6581 kg ha-1.

A claim from EFEECT OF RATIONALIZATION IRRIGATION WATER USE AND RIDGE WIDTH ON WHEAT AND ITS SOME WATER RELATIONS · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide ridges with 1.0 C.P.E. gave highest grain yield of 6761 and 6581 kg ha-1.

Treatment
planting in 120 cm ridges (beds) and irrigationat 1.0 C.P.E.e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste1
Value
6761 and 6581 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield(6761 and 6581 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–808
e1

“planting in 120 cm ridges (beds) and irrigationat 1.0 C.P.E., gave the highest averages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–677
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71

Title

EFEECT OF RATIONALIZATION IRRIGATION WATER USE AND RIDGE WIDTH ON WHEAT AND ITS SOME WATER RELATIONS

S. M. M. Abdou; S. M. Emam Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2018. doi:10.21608/fjard.2021.191115

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-094c3bd1a7ef6b62fe617eacffb4d47b47d14016e88dac0aab18d513f69f46c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.