Claim · model-written summary
Except for heavy thinning, thinning did not significantly affect bole allocation proportion.
- Taxon
- Shortleaf Pine
Pinus echinatat0 - Treatment
- thinning treatmentse0
- Outcome
- proportion of biomass allocation to bolee0
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte0
- Qualifier
- Unless heavily thinnede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Shortleaf Pine”
e0“Unless heavily thinned, thinning treatments did not significantly affect the proportion of biomass allocation to bole.”
Title
Gyawali, Nabin SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) 2014
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Total tree and bole wood biomass in thinned plots converged toward unthinned plots.
- Intervention effect At site one, 70% stocking exceeded unthinned biomass after 16 years.
- Association Heavily thinned stands may take longer to converge in biomass.
- Association Foliage and bark biomass fell as thinning intensity rose.
- Intervention effect Thinning significantly affected the biomass proportions in branches and bark.
- Intervention effect Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass.
- Intervention effect Heavy thinning appeared to increase foliage fraction, without statistical significance.
- Association Better sites allocated more biomass to bole wood.
- Association Better sites allocated less biomass to foliage.