Claim · model-written summary
Combined abiotic stress and F. oxysporum infection had an additive negative effect on plant performance.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Combined abiotic stressors with F. oxysporume0
- Interactor
- F. oxysporum
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen - Outcome
- plant performancee0
- Direction
- negative effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Combined abiotic stressors with F. oxysporum but not with V. dahliae infection led to an additive negative effect on plant performance.”
t0“Tomato”
Title
Burkhardt Flemer; Sneha Gulati; Alessandro Bergna; et al. Phytobiomes Journal 2022. doi:10.1094/pbiomes-10-21-0067-r
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect All tested stresses reduced tomato growth and photosynthetic activity.
- Intervention effect Combined abiotic stress and V. dahliae infection did not have an additive negative effect on plant performance.
- Intervention effect Every stress condition shifted the tomato root microbiome.
- Intervention effect Stresses changed abundances of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria classes.
- Observation Bacillus endophytes tolerated abiotic stress and benefited plants.
- Observation Paenibacillus endophytes tolerated abiotic stress and benefited plants.
- Observation Microbacterium endophytes tolerated abiotic stress and benefited plants.
- Association F. oxysporum infection enriched Paenibacillus in roots.
- Association V. dahliae infection enriched Microbacterium in roots.
- Observation Growth promoting endophytes were obtained from biotic and combined stress roots, but not from roots exposed to abiotic stress alone.