Intervention effectmodel-written summary

N harvest index, recovery efficiency and physiological efficiency showed an obvious reduction as N application rate increased.

A claim from Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Nitrogen Absorption,Translocation and Fertilizer-nitrogen Use Efficiency in Japonica Rice Cultivar Nanjing 44 · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N harvest index, recovery efficiency and physiological efficiency showed an obvious reduction as N application rate increased.

Treatment
N application ratee1
Outcome
N harvest index(NHI),recovery efficiency(RE),physiological efficiency(PE)e1
Direction
obvious reductione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Japonica Rice Cultivar Nanjing 44”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–149
e1

“N harvest index(NHI),recovery efficiency(RE),physiological efficiency(PE),agronomic efficiency(AE) and partial factor productivity(PFP) showed obvious reduction as N application rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–853

Title

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Nitrogen Absorption,Translocation and Fertilizer-nitrogen Use Efficiency in Japonica Rice Cultivar Nanjing 44

Xue Xin-hong Guangdong nongye kexue 2009

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-0b440aa92ff802ea5d6e899314703348a6ac747afc0763e79ebe03aaec36a108 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,803 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2,036 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.