Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave higher effective cobs per plant.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- number of effective cob plant-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- conservation tillagee0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
e0“number of effective cob plant-1 were higher in conventional tillage as compared to conservation tillage”
Title
B De; S Bandyopadhyay SAARC Journal of Agriculture 2014. doi:10.3329/sja.v11i1.18390
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect In the first two years conventional tillage gave higher maize growth attributes than conservation tillage.
- Intervention effect In the first two years conventional tillage gave higher maize grain yield than conservation tillage.
- Intervention effect In the first two years conventional tillage gave higher maize stover yield than conservation tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave higher kernel rows per cob, kernels per row and 100 seed weight.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave higher seeds per cob, cob girth and cob length.
- Observation The authors report that conservation tillage showed favorable soil health characteristics.
- Intervention effect Mulching at 4 t ha-1 performed better than unmulched treatments.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer plus vermicompost improved maize growth attributes.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer plus vermicompost increased maize grain yield.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer plus vermicompost increased maize stover yield.