Claim · model-written summary
In the first two years conventional tillage gave higher maize stover yield than conservation tillage.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- stover yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- conservation tillagee0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
e0“In the first two years of experimentation, though different growth attributes, grain yield, stover yield, and different yield attributing characters such as kernel rows cob-1, number of kernels row-1, 100 seed weight (g), number of seeds cob-1, girth of cob, length of cob and number of effective cob plant-1 were higher in conventional tillage as compared to conservation tillage”
Title
B De; S Bandyopadhyay SAARC Journal of Agriculture 2014. doi:10.3329/sja.v11i1.18390
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect In the first two years conventional tillage gave higher maize growth attributes than conservation tillage.
- Intervention effect In the first two years conventional tillage gave higher maize grain yield than conservation tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave higher kernel rows per cob, kernels per row and 100 seed weight.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave higher seeds per cob, cob girth and cob length.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave higher effective cobs per plant.
- Observation The authors report that conservation tillage showed favorable soil health characteristics.
- Intervention effect Mulching at 4 t ha-1 performed better than unmulched treatments.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer plus vermicompost improved maize growth attributes.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer plus vermicompost increased maize grain yield.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer plus vermicompost increased maize stover yield.