Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilizer rate increased sugarcane leaf area.

A claim from LEAF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF SUGARCANE IRRIGATED AND FERTILIZED WITH DIFFERENT SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilizer rate increased sugarcane leaf area.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of the nitrogen fertilizer rate provided an increase in leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1448
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40

Title

LEAF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF SUGARCANE IRRIGATED AND FERTILIZED WITH DIFFERENT SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN

Ana Carolina Oliveira Horschutz; Fernando Nobre Cunha; Marconi Batista Teixeira; et al. Irriga 2022. doi:10.15809/irriga.2022v27n2p296-310

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-0c4e3d6a262fe3e036d2f0a1ccc42be2a857f8cb543f9cee333bd64d2c7b0062 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Fertigation increased ratoon cane vegetative growth.

    Yield of sugarcane submitted to nitrogen fertilization and water depths by subsurface drip irrigation · 2016

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Within-row compost significantly reduced root surface area versus control.

    Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Municipal waste composts had no effect or harmed sugarcane growth.

    Organic Material Soil Amendment Effects on Root Rot and Sugarcane Growth and Characterization of the Materials · 1999

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase tillering at Morrinhos-GO.

    Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Field fresh weight was comparable across nitrogen treatments.

    Impact of urea fertilization rates on nitrogen losses, productivity and profitability in East African sugarcane plantations · 2024

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Green manuring reduced sugarcane biomass accumulation by 7 to 16%.

    Effect of intercropped prickly sesban (Sesbania cannabina) green-manure and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of sugarcane. · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Fertilizer combinations did not significantly affect germination, CCS or sugar recovery.

    Comparative efficiency of solid and liquid fertilizers in sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Grower habitual fertilizer was the costliest and had inferior germination.

    Fertilizer Effects on Mechanization Wide Row Spacing Sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.