Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SRI gave significantly higher net assimilation rate in both years.

A claim from Effect of Different Crop Establishment Methods and Weed Management Practices on Growth Indices and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI gave significantly higher net assimilation rate in both years.

Treatment
system of rice intensification (SRI)e0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher crop growth rate, relative growth rate, absolute growth rate, net assimilation rate and grain yield was recorded in system of rice intensification (SRI) during both the years of investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1055
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–130

Title

Effect of Different Crop Establishment Methods and Weed Management Practices on Growth Indices and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Shivanand Maurya; Rajesh Kumar; Ravi Verma; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i173180

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-0cd87a4d9d6c09f2bc3b33cf521ed85bf1b60c2658f82a094a352c06c72034ba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    SRI had greater leaf area index due to larger leaves.

    AN ASSESSMENT OF PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION (SRI) PRACTICES COMPARED WITH RECOMMENDED RICE CULTIVATION PRACTICES IN INDIA · 2009

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Sprinkler irrigation reduced plant height by 0.09 to 0.28 m compared with flooding.

    Sprinkler vs. Flood Irrigation in Traditional Rice Production Regions of Southeast Texas · 1990 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Cold irrigation significantly reduced rice shoot and root dry weight and height.

    Effect of Low Temperature of Irrigation Water on Rice Growth and Nutrient Uptake · 1994 · compared with hot temperature treatment

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Soil mechanical impedance as low as 0.01 MPa inhibited rice root growth in a lowland field gradient treatment.

    Root Response to Water Stress in Rainfed Lowland Rice · 1990

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Growth performance and physiological activities of rice differed only marginally for a 5-day irrigation difference.

    Impact of cyclic water stress on growth, physiological responses and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in tropical environment · 2014

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    AWD decreased rice height by 9% relative to control.

    Effect of various water regimes on rice production in lowland irrigation · 2015 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    AWDI had no significant effect on rice biomass and grain.

    Nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy: Impacts of rice straw and water management · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Ending irrigation early in cv. Gleva later caused a substantial decline in the ability of seeds to germinate normally.

    Seed quality in rice is most sensitive to drought and high temperature in early seed development · 2019

    Opposite direction

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.