Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Excess boron decreased flag leaf area, leaf area duration and grain weight of wheat accessions compared with the control.

A claim from Boron Tolerance in Wheat Accessions of Different Origin Estimated in Controlled and Field Conditions · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess boron decreased flag leaf area, leaf area duration and grain weight of wheat accessions compared with the control.

Treatment
excess borone0
Outcome
flag leaf area, leaf area duration and grain weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24
e0

“assess the effects of excess boron on 59 genetically divergent wheat accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–103
e2

“The study comprised a control and three boron treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–406
e1

“Parameters were mostly decreased by excess boron when compared to the control (seedling root length, seedling dry weight, grain number per spike, grain yield, flag leaf area, leaf area duration and grain weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–929

Title

Boron Tolerance in Wheat Accessions of Different Origin Estimated in Controlled and Field Conditions

Milka Brdar‐Jokanović; Miroslav Zorić; Ankica Kondić‐Špika; et al. FiVeR (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia) 2017

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-0cda45308b3e5e7c4882297eb42e7c8535c1eb4ad9f56e39f0bbf1c6950528d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.