Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seedling viability index fell 68.14% under 120 μM PbCl2 application without H. filicina extract.

A claim from Ameliorative effect of Halopteris filicina extracts on growth parameters and genomic DNA template stability of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under lead chloride stress · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling viability index fell 68.14% under 120 μM PbCl2 application without H. filicina extract.

Taxon
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
120 μM PbCl2 application without H. filicina extracte0
Outcome
seedling viability indexe3
Direction
decreasede0
Value
68.14%e0
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seedling viability index was decreased by 68.14% at 120 μM PbCl2 application without H. filicina extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1067
e1

“seeds of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–356
e2

“distilled water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–538
e3

“The seedling viability index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–987

Title

Ameliorative effect of Halopteris filicina extracts on growth parameters and genomic DNA template stability of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under lead chloride stress

Dilek Unal; Gulcin Sevim; Gokay Varis; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2022. doi:10.1071/cp21455

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-0e69ed06c3d9ba510330ca00231bd8ff90e4300c2f7504deae51e8d5fb17a37c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 203 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.