Claim · model-written summary
Three irrigations gave 12.37 percent higher benefit-cost ratio than two irrigations.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- three irrigationse0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.37 percente0
- Comparator
- two irrigationse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three irrigations being similar to four irrigations recorded higher net return and B:C ratio to the extent of 15.48 and 12.37 percent compared to minimum recorded under two irrigations i.e. 44959 and 1.86 respectively.”
t0“wheat varieties”
Title
Performance of wheat varieties under different irrigation condition
Sheela Barla; R. R. Upasani Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Four irrigations produced 12.29 percent more total tillers than two irrigations.
- Intervention effect Four irrigations produced 15.98 percent more effective tillers than two irrigations.
- Intervention effect Three irrigations gave 15.48 percent higher net return than two irrigations.
- Association K9107 gave 34.37 percent higher grain yield than NW2036.
- Association K9107 gave 29.40 percent higher straw yield than NW2036.
- Association K9107 gave a 52.90 percent higher benefit-cost ratio than NW2036.
- Association K0307 was similar to K9107 in grain yield, straw yield, and benefit-cost ratio.