Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Application of PM lowered soil bulk density from 1.19 t/m3 in the control to 1.10 and 1.05 t/m3.

A claim from COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF UREA N, POULTRY MANURE AND THEIR COMBINATION IN CHANGING SOIL PROPERTIES AND MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS IN NORTHEAST PAKISTAN · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of PM lowered soil bulk density from 1.19 t/m3 in the control to 1.10 and 1.05 t/m3.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of PMe1
Outcome
soil bulk densitye1
Direction
lowerede1
Value
1.10 and 1.05 t m −3e1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield attributes of maize grown at Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–274
e1

“Application of PM lowered soil bulk density from 1.19 t m −3 in the control to 1.10 and 1.05 t m −3 in N 120PM and N 150U , enhanced pH from 7.39 to 7.65 and 7.78 and increased soil organic matter (22 and 32%), total N (21 and 26%), available P (44 and 55%) and available K (10 and 15%) compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1909

Title

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF UREA N, POULTRY MANURE AND THEIR COMBINATION IN CHANGING SOIL PROPERTIES AND MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS IN NORTHEAST PAKISTAN

M. KALEEM ABBASI; ABDUL KHALIQ; M SHAFIQ; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2010. doi:10.1017/s0014479709991050

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-0fba81bcab080fcfb55b26187c46232db7a3b1aa810ef9e689bfdc1b9ea1224d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.