Abstract
Research information on poultry manure’s impact on soil characteristics, mineral composition and maize performance is scarce, despite the vital role nutrient levels play in supporting human health. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of poultry manure on soil properties, grain mineral content, growth, grain yield and economic benefit of maize. A two-year field experiment (2022–2023) was conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State using five poultry manure levels (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha⁻ 1 ) in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Poultry manure significantly reduced soil bulk density and improved porosity, moisture content, chemical properties, and grain mineral composition. Maize growth and yield increased with higher manure levels, but the 10 t ha⁻ 1 treatment produced the best outcomes, offering comparable nutritional quality and yield to the 15 and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments. Relative to the control, grain yield increased by 54.6%, 94.6%, 93.5%, and 91.4% for 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments, respectively. The 10 t ha⁻ 1 application rate was the most cost-effective and beneficial for improving soil properties and maize productivity, as indicated by the benefit-to-cost ratio. This study recommended the use of 10 t ha⁻ 1 poultry manure for soil fertility management, sustainable nutrition, and enhanced maize performance in the study area. The findings highlight poultry manure’s potential to improve soil properties, maize yield, and nutrient content, contributing to better human nutrition in areas with depleted soils.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Poultry manure reduced soil bulk density.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Poultry manure significantly reduced soil bulk density”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Poultry manure improved soil porosity, moisture and chemical properties.
- Treatment
- Poultry manuree0
- Outcome
- porosity, moisture content, chemical propertiese0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Poultry manure significantly reduced soil bulk density and improved porosity, moisture content, chemical properties, and grain mineral composition”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Poultry manure improved grain mineral composition.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Poultry manure significantly reduced soil bulk density and improved porosity, moisture content, chemical properties, and grain mineral composition”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize growth increased with higher poultry manure levels.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maize growth and yield increased with higher manure levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield increased with higher poultry manure levels.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maize growth and yield increased with higher manure levels”
Claim · model-written summary
The 10 t ha⁻ 1 rate gave the best outcomes, comparable to 15 and 20 t ha⁻ 1 for yield and nutritional quality.
- Treatment
- 10 t ha⁻ 1 treatmente0
- Outcome
- nutritional quality and yielde0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- 15 and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the 10 t ha⁻ 1 treatment produced the best outcomes, offering comparable nutritional quality and yield to the 15 and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased by 54.6% with 5 poultry manure versus control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relative to the control, grain yield increased by 54.6%, 94.6%, 93.5%, and 91.4% for 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments, respectively.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased by 94.6% with 10 poultry manure versus control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relative to the control, grain yield increased by 54.6%, 94.6%, 93.5%, and 91.4% for 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments, respectively.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased by 93.5% with 15 poultry manure versus control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relative to the control, grain yield increased by 54.6%, 94.6%, 93.5%, and 91.4% for 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments, respectively.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased by 91.4% with 20 t ha⁻ 1 poultry manure versus control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relative to the control, grain yield increased by 54.6%, 94.6%, 93.5%, and 91.4% for 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha⁻ 1 treatments, respectively.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The 10 t ha⁻ 1 rate was the most cost-effective and beneficial by benefit-to-cost ratio.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The 10 t ha⁻ 1 application rate was the most cost-effective and beneficial for improving soil properties and maize productivity, as indicated by the benefit-to-cost ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 10 t ha⁻ 1 poultry manure for fertility and maize performance.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“This study recommended the use of 10 t ha⁻ 1 poultry manure for soil fertility management, sustainable nutrition, and enhanced maize performance in the study area”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
102 papers more in this group
See all 106 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.