Paper · 1985 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Plant density, distribution, and fertilizer effects on yield and quality of irrigated corn silage

D. L. Karlen; C. R. Camp; J. P. Zublena

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Grain deficits frequently occur in the Southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain because erratic rainfall patterns and soil properties often limit corn (Zea mays L.) yields, however, harvesting corn for silage may enable farmers to produce a second grain crop during the same calendar year. Effects of row spacing, plant population, and fertilizer program on yield, quality, and mineral concentrations of corn silage grown with irrigation on Typic Paleudult soils were therefore investigated. Two plant population treatments which averaged 7.0 and 10.1 plants m‐2 were evaluated with two fertilizer programs that differed in N, N and K, and N, P, and K in 1980, 1981, and 1982, respectively. Each plant density by fertilizer combination was evaluated in single rows spaced 96 cm apart and in twin rows which approximately doubled the intrarow plant spacing. Plot size for the 2×2×2 factorial experiment ranged from 30 to 44 m2. Yield, quality, and mineral concentrations of corn silage grown in single rows spaced 96 or 75 cm apart and twin rows were also evaluated in large (185 m2) plots under center pivot irrigation during 1981 and 1982. Dry matter yields of 22 to 26 Mg ha‐1 were achieved with plant densities of 6.7 to 13.5 plants m‐2 at both experimental sites. Highest silage yields were produced with stand densities of 9 m or more planted in single 75 cm or twin rows, but yield differences were statistically significant at P(0.05) in only two of five site years. Increasing total N‐P‐K application beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”; increased crude protein slightly in 1980 and significantly in 1981 and 1982. Concentrations of Mn and Zn in silage were increased by higher fertilization, presumably because nitrification reduced surface soil pH and increased their availability. Dry matter yield, fiber, energy, and other mineral nutrients were not significantly influenced by fertilizer program. These experiments identified management practices for the Atlantic Coastal Plain which resulted in corn silage yields equal to those produced in the cooler mountain region of Georgia and that exceeded current average production in South Carolina by approximately 40% without reducing apparent feed quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated corn silage yielded 22 to 26 Mg ha‐1 at plant densities of 6.7 to 13.5 plants m‐2 at both sites.

Outcome
Dry matter yieldse0
Value
22 to 26 Mg ha‐1e0
Qualifier
plant densities of 6.7 to 13.5 plants m‐2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter yields of 22 to 26 Mg ha‐1 were achieved with plant densities of 6.7 to 13.5 plants m‐2 at both experimental sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stand densities of at least 9 in single 75 cm or twin rows gave the highest silage yields, with significant differences in only two of five site years.

Treatment
stand densities of 9 m or more planted in single 75 cm or twin rowse0
Outcome
silage yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Qualifier
only two of five site yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest silage yields were produced with stand densities of 9 m or more planted in single 75 cm or twin rows, but yield differences were statistically significant at P(0.05) in only two of five site years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N-P-K beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”; slightly increased crude protein in 1980.

Treatment
total N‐P‐K application beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”e0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
slightly in 1980e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing total N‐P‐K application beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”; increased crude protein slightly in 1980 and significantly in 1981 and 1982.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N-P-K beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”; significantly increased crude protein in 1981 and 1982.

Treatment
total N‐P‐K application beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”e0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
significantly in 1981 and 1982e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing total N‐P‐K application beyond 200–30–167 kg ha”; increased crude protein slightly in 1980 and significantly in 1981 and 1982.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization increased Mn and Zn concentrations in corn silage.

Treatment
higher fertilizatione0
Outcome
Concentrations of Mn and Zn in silagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of Mn and Zn in silage were increased by higher fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed increased Mn and Zn in silage to nitrification lowering surface soil pH and increasing availability.

Treatment
higher fertilizatione0
Outcome
Concentrations of Mn and Zn in silagee0
Qualifier
presumably because nitrification reduced surface soil pH and increased their availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of Mn and Zn in silage were increased by higher fertilization, presumably because nitrification reduced surface soil pH and increased their availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer program did not significantly influence dry matter yield, fiber, energy or other mineral nutrients.

Treatment
fertilizer programe0
Outcome
Dry matter yield, fiber, energy, and other mineral nutrientse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter yield, fiber, energy, and other mineral nutrients were not significantly influenced by fertilizer program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The identified management practices gave corn silage yields equal to those in the cooler Georgia mountain region.

Outcome
corn silage yieldse0
Direction
equal toe0
Comparator
those produced in the cooler mountain region of Georgiae0
Setting
Atlantic Coastal Plaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management practices for the Atlantic Coastal Plain which resulted in corn silage yields equal to those produced in the cooler mountain region of Georgia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2085 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The management practices exceeded average South Carolina corn silage production by approximately 40%.

Outcome
current average productione0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
approximately 40%e0
Setting
South Carolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exceeded current average production in South Carolina by approximately 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2095–2169 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those yields were achieved without reducing apparent feed quality.

Outcome
apparent feed qualitye0
Direction
without reducinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without reducing apparent feed quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2170–2208 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.