Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FW1 and FW2 saved 19% to 35% of potassium fertilizer compared with FW

A claim from Reducing Nutrient and Irrigation Rates in Solar Greenhouse without Compromising Tomato Yield · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FW1 and FW2 saved 19% to 35% of potassium fertilizer compared with FW

Treatment
FW1 and FW2e2
Outcome
potassium (K 2 O) fertilizere3
Direction
savede3
Value
19% to 35%e3
Comparator
FWe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to study the effect of different nutrient and water treatments on the growth and yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–222
e2

“Compared with FW, FW1 and FW2 had yields not significantly different from grower control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–627
e3

“they saved 35% to 46% of the nitrogen (N) fertilizer, 40% to 54% of the phosphorus (P 2 O 5 ) fertilizer, 19% to 35% of the potassium (K 2 O) fertilizer, and 15% to 21% of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–826

Title

Reducing Nutrient and Irrigation Rates in Solar Greenhouse without Compromising Tomato Yield

Shichao Wang; Xinlu Bai; Jianbin Zhou; et al. HortScience 2019. doi:10.21273/hortsci13523-18

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-0fc2b76f0b6c8d2e04abbaec02f5094cf72bd6fff9b5ffb34c6eedbfcf8fd2ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer