Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 73% shade, most tomato growth aspects were highest versus unshaded plants, except stem diameter.

A claim from Effect of some climatic factors and irrigation regimes on tomato growth and chemical constituents · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 73% shade, most tomato growth aspects were highest versus unshaded plants, except stem diameter.

Treatment
73% of shade densitye1
Outcome
growth aspectse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
except stem diametere1
Comparator
unshaded treatmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“73% of shade density reflected the highest values of all growth aspects such as plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves and stems, fresh and dry weight of leaves and except stem diameter compared to the unshaded treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1154
e2

“Effect of some climatic factors and irrigation regimes on tomato growth and chemical constituents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97

Title

Effect of some climatic factors and irrigation regimes on tomato growth and chemical constituents

Zaki; F Aboasedera; L Badr; et al. Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2014. doi:10.21608/assjm.2014.111872

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-0fc771025c3fa7eb3decba541e3c6138c75f28b0aa8ad8668def16154d3c10aa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

shade · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.